On 24/03/2022 19:17, Ryan Long wrote:
On 3/24/2022 12:59 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 24/03/2022 18:42, Ryan Long wrote:
But if we're just bumping the hash because we're running into
checksum failures, why would we need a patch attached to a ticket to
just bump the hash?
Why did the hash
On 3/24/2022 12:59 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 24/03/2022 18:42, Ryan Long wrote:
But if we're just bumping the hash because we're running into
checksum failures, why would we need a patch attached to a ticket to
just bump the hash?
Why did the hash change? Is this because the actual pa
On 24/03/2022 18:42, Ryan Long wrote:
But if we're just bumping the hash because we're running into checksum
failures, why would we need a patch attached to a ticket to just bump
the hash?
Why did the hash change? Is this because the actual patch changed or
because there were some changes i
I didn't see that any of the patches attached to tickets that were
updating RSB config files. They only seemed to be applying the patches
to the directories where the source code is located. I don't know if
this is possible with the RSB. At least I didn't see an example of it
being done.
But
On 23/03/2022 17:30, Ryan Long wrote:
Fixed checksum failure when building qemu.
I think we had similar issues before. The workaround was to attach the
patch to an RTEMS ticket.
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-
