Re: [PATCH] confdefs.h: Add SMP enabled field to configuration

On 12/05/17 11:20, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 12/05/17 11:15, Joel Sherrill wrote: On May 12, 2017 3:44 AM, "Sebastian Huber" > wrote: On 12/05/17 10:39, Chris Johns wrote: On 12/05/2017 18:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: Do n

Re: [PATCH] confdefs.h: Add SMP enabled field to configuration

On 12/05/17 11:15, Joel Sherrill wrote: On May 12, 2017 3:44 AM, "Sebastian Huber" > wrote: On 12/05/17 10:39, Chris Johns wrote: On 12/05/2017 18:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: Do not use the processor count to determine if SM

Re: [PATCH] confdefs.h: Add SMP enabled field to configuration

On May 12, 2017 3:44 AM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: On 12/05/17 10:39, Chris Johns wrote: > On 12/05/2017 18:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> Do not use the processor count to determine if SMP is enabled. Instead >> use a dedicated configuration option. Enable

Re: [PATCH] confdefs.h: Add SMP enabled field to configuration

On 12/05/17 10:39, Chris Johns wrote: On 12/05/2017 18:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: Do not use the processor count to determine if SMP is enabled. Instead use a dedicated configuration option. Enable SMP by default in SMP configurations. Add CONFIGURE_DISABLE_SMP_CONFIGURATION to all test which

Re: [PATCH] confdefs.h: Add SMP enabled field to configuration

On 12/05/2017 18:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: Do not use the processor count to determine if SMP is enabled. Instead use a dedicated configuration option. Enable SMP by default in SMP configurations. Add CONFIGURE_DISABLE_SMP_CONFIGURATION to all test which would fail otherwise. I think addin