On May 12, 2017 3:44 AM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
On 12/05/17 10:39, Chris Johns wrote: > On 12/05/2017 18:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> Do not use the processor count to determine if SMP is enabled. Instead >> use a dedicated configuration option. Enable SMP by default in SMP >> configurations. >> >> Add CONFIGURE_DISABLE_SMP_CONFIGURATION to all test which would fail >> otherwise. >> >> > I think adding a comment to the test explaining the reason would be good > to have. > This is a new issue and not a 4.12 release blocker from my point of view: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3020 This does not address Chris' question. Whether a blocker or not, it needs a comment for each test. You can't add this patch without the comments before or after branching. My first thought was that your answer was comparable to "Ice cream has no rocks." -- Sebastian Huber, embedde brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
