On 10/2/21 1:04 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Is there a sustainable plan for beyond the project lifetime (maybe,
> something we need to discuss separately)?
I am not aware of a plan. It is up to those wanting to benefit from the
qualification effort to initiate this and to provide the support or appr
Hello Sebastian,
On 2/9/21 3:14 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 09/02/2021 15:10, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:07 AM Sebastian Huber
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/02/2021 15:04, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>
> We are responsible to monitor the RTEMS development during the
> pre-qua
On 09/02/2021 15:10, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:07 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
On 09/02/2021 15:04, Gedare Bloom wrote:
We are responsible to monitor the RTEMS development during the
pre-qualification activity and adjust the specification, etc. I would
have sent you an e-mai
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:07 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 09/02/2021 15:04, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> >> We are responsible to monitor the RTEMS development during the
> >> pre-qualification activity and adjust the specification, etc. I would
> >> have sent you an e-mail that a specification upda
On 09/02/2021 15:04, Gedare Bloom wrote:
We are responsible to monitor the RTEMS development during the
pre-qualification activity and adjust the specification, etc. I would
have sent you an e-mail that a specification update is necessary. The
basedefs is an area with a higher probability of cha
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 2:46 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Hello Frank,
>
> On 09/02/2021 10:12, Frank Kühndel wrote:
> > [...]
> > No objections but I am missing something. We do not used a certain
> > frozen RTEMS version for the pre-qualification, do we?
> we definitely don't use a frozen RTEMS
Hello Sebastian,
On 2/8/21 7:54 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 14/12/2020 09:44, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>> Change RTEMS_STRING() and RTEMS_XSTRING() to accept a variable number of
>> arguments which is stringified. This can be used for example to create
>> register lists for inline assembler
Hello Frank,
On 09/02/2021 10:12, Frank Kühndel wrote:
[...]
No objections but I am missing something. We do not used a certain
frozen RTEMS version for the pre-qualification, do we?
we definitely don't use a frozen RTEMS version for the pre-qualification.
This brings about the problem that v
sorry, I saw it before and it looked reasonable/harmless to me.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 11:55 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 14/12/2020 09:44, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> > Change RTEMS_STRING() and RTEMS_XSTRING() to accept a variable number of
> > arguments w
On 14/12/2020 09:44, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Change RTEMS_STRING() and RTEMS_XSTRING() to accept a variable number of
arguments which is stringified. This can be used for example to create
register lists for inline assembler statements.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h | 16 --
10 matches
Mail list logo
