On 01/10/2020 17:51, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:45 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:07 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
This looks ok to me. I suppose eliminating the dependency requires the
function pointer indirection. The only thing I don't see is why
redefinitio
On 01/10/2020 17:07, Gedare Bloom wrote:
This looks ok to me. I suppose eliminating the dependency requires the
function pointer indirection. The only thing I don't see is why
redefinition of the _Workspace_Malloc_initializer is allowed in both
wkspacemallocinitdefault.c and in confdefs/wkspace.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:45 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:07 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> This looks ok to me. I suppose eliminating the dependency requires the
>> function pointer indirection. The only thing I don't see is why
>> redefinition of the _Workspace_Malloc_
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:07 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> This looks ok to me. I suppose eliminating the dependency requires the
> function pointer indirection. The only thing I don't see is why
> redefinition of the _Workspace_Malloc_initializer is allowed in both
> wkspacemallocinitdefault.c and in
This looks ok to me. I suppose eliminating the dependency requires the
function pointer indirection. The only thing I don't see is why
redefinition of the _Workspace_Malloc_initializer is allowed in both
wkspacemallocinitdefault.c and in confdefs/wkspace.h. I would think
that will cause an error fo
