On 01/10/2020 17:51, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:45 AM Joel Sherrill<j...@rtems.org> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:07 AM Gedare Bloom<ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
This looks ok to me. I suppose eliminating the dependency requires the
function pointer indirection. The only thing I don't see is why
redefinition of the _Workspace_Malloc_initializer is allowed in both
wkspacemallocinitdefault.c and in confdefs/wkspace.h. I would think
that will cause an error for multiple definitions.
I think Entangle is the wrong work. Disentangle or possibly decouple.
Does minimum actually reflect what you think is the smallest possible
configuration now? That as always the test's purpose -- to have a single
executable that was the smallest we thought we could produce. It seems
with all your changes that it needs a review for tweaks to the configuration.
Should open a ticket to review this. Certainly after all the static
initialization/construct stuff it should be possible to go smaller.
I am not done with the initialization and workspace changes, but it is
not much left to do.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
