On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2016 2:05 PM, "Gedare Bloom" wrote:
>>
>> This is/should be based on the definition of _POSIX_CLOCK_SELECTION
>> and we get this from newlib/libc/include/sys/features.h as of commit
>> 9a80679aae9098aa189f7ea8ce7892e2c092f3be in new
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> > On Nov 9, 2016 2:05 PM, "Gedare Bloom" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This is/should be based on the definition of _POSIX_CLOCK_SELE
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Nov 9, 2016 2:05 PM, "Gedare Bloom" wrote:
> >>
> >> This is/should be based on the definition of _POSIX_CLOCK_SELECTION
> >> and we get this from newlib/libc/include/sys/features.h
On Nov 9, 2016 2:05 PM, "Gedare Bloom" wrote:
>
> This is/should be based on the definition of _POSIX_CLOCK_SELECTION
> and we get this from newlib/libc/include/sys/features.h as of commit
> 9a80679aae9098aa189f7ea8ce7892e2c092f3be in newlib.git. If there is a
> warning, then probably rsb is not g
This is/should be based on the definition of _POSIX_CLOCK_SELECTION
and we get this from newlib/libc/include/sys/features.h as of commit
9a80679aae9098aa189f7ea8ce7892e2c092f3be in newlib.git. If there is a
warning, then probably rsb is not getting a new enough newlib for it.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 a
Hi
In a build sweep, I noticed that every use of clock_nanosleep()
has a warning for it not being defined. I don't seem to be able
to find the magic to turn on the prototype in time.h. Does
anyone see what needs to be done?
==
#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200112L
#include
void f(voi
