On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
>> > On Nov 9, 2016 2:05 PM, "Gedare Bloom" <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This is/should be based on the definition of _POSIX_CLOCK_SELECTION
>> >> and we get this from newlib/libc/include/sys/features.h as of commit
>> >> 9a80679aae9098aa189f7ea8ce7892e2c092f3be in newlib.git. If there is a
>> >> warning, then probably rsb is not getting a new enough newlib for it.
>> >
>> > Yep. Saw that and thought a POSIX_C_SOURCE define would trip it but it
>> > didn't.
>> >
>> > We are at newlib-2.4.0.20160527-1. There is a 20160923.
>> >
>> > Do we need to upgrade newlib?
>> >
>> Yes.
>>
>
> And I just had to report to newlib a build error. Hopefully we
> can get a newer snapshot that builds. :(
>
Fix all known issues, ask for a snapshot for 12/1. If nothing else,
wait for the next release that should come at end-of-year.
>> > And .. did we get resolution on my patch to upgrade binutils?
>> >
>>
>> Chris asked for testing, and Sebastian said to just make sure it
>> builds on all targets.
>>
>
> OK. I will push it in a little while. I have been using it for a couple
> of months and just forgot to submit it.
>
> --joel
>
>>
>> > --joel
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
>> >> > Hi
>> >> >
>> >> > In a build sweep, I noticed that every use of clock_nanosleep()
>> >> > has a warning for it not being defined. I don't seem to be able
>> >> > to find the magic to turn on the prototype in time.h. Does
>> >> > anyone see what needs to be done?
>> >> >
>> >> > ==================
>> >> > #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200112L
>> >> >
>> >> > #include <time.h>
>> >> >
>> >> > void f(void)
>> >> > {
>> >> > int rc;
>> >> >
>> >> > rc = clock_nanosleep();
>> >> > }
>> >> > ==================
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >
>> >> > --joel
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > devel mailing list
>> >> > devel@rtems.org
>> >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
