Linker set based initialization

This patch set implements fine grained linker set based initialization. The basic framework is already in place for several weeks. See ticket https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2408 for the details. The individual patches contain mostly mechanical changes. There are virtually no changes in the

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On 09/12/15 13:48, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 08/12/15 21:10, Sebastian Huber wrote: - Am 8. Dez 2015 um 16:03 schrieb Joel Sherrill : What BSPs/architectures have you tested? I will test the with the attached patch tomorrow on all BSPs. This patch adds a link time test to ticker.

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On 08/12/15 21:10, Sebastian Huber wrote: - Am 8. Dez 2015 um 16:03 schrieb Joel Sherrill : What BSPs/architectures have you tested? I will test the with the attached patch tomorrow on all BSPs. This patch adds a link time test to ticker. This test verifies that the linker comman

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

- Am 8. Dez 2015 um 21:24 schrieb Joel Sherrill j...@rtems.org: > Sorry. I didn't see that patch get committed this morning and didn't realize > it addressed the issue. When you said, BSPs needed to use linkcmds.base > and not cut and paste, I took that to mean you hadn't touched any other >

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

Sorry. I didn't see that patch get committed this morning and didn't realize it addressed the issue. When you said, BSPs needed to use linkcmds.base and not cut and paste, I took that to mean you hadn't touched any other BSPs. I will try to test some on BSPs you didn't. Is the ticker addition jus

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

ets are all right. I verified by hand that it detects a missing KEEP(), SORT() or section description. I think the linker set based initialization is very beneficial. For example with it we no longer need a build time option to disable/enable the POSIX API. We can enable it all the time w

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

Hello Joel, before you start with wild guessing, please look at the patch: https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=b618d8cfc54f84d4ed03dc7b7fa510c872e6128a - Am 8. Dez 2015 um 16:45 schrieb Joel Sherrill : > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-bra

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

We can also route student questions to here if we don't know the answers. On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Se

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > >> > >> On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >>> > >>> What BSPs/architectures have you tested? > >> > >> > >

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> >>> What BSPs/architectures have you tested? >> >> >> I temporarily moved the splinkersets01 test to the samples/ticker and >> tes

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> What BSPs/architectures have you tested? >> > > I temporarily moved the splinkersets01 test to the samples/ticker and > tested that all BSPs build and link th

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On 08/12/15 16:09, Sebastian Huber wrote: Is this something that breaks on a per BSP basis? or per architecture basis? I am assuming that since it is linker based, each BSP could have broken linkcmds. Is that right? It breaks on a per linker command file basis. Since all the maintained BSP

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

On 08/12/15 16:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: What BSPs/architectures have you tested? I temporarily moved the splinkersets01 test to the samples/ticker and tested that all BSPs build and link this test. I executed the splinkersets01 test on sis, psim and arm_realview_pbx_a9_qemu. Is this som

Re: Linker Set Based Initialization

What BSPs/architectures have you tested? Is this something that breaks on a per BSP basis? or per architecture basis? I am assuming that since it is linker based, each BSP could have broken linkcmds. Is that right? --joel On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded

Linker Set Based Initialization

Hello, I checked in the support for linker sets (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2408). Please review the API https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/score/include/rtems/linkersets.h and documentation https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/doc/user/linkersets.t carefully. For an example please ha