Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

Yes, I got it. Thank you. On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 12:00 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:28 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:27 AM Richi Dubey > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > >> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h > > >> +++ b/cpukit/in

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:28 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:27 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h > >> +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h > >> @@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ > >> && !defined(CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_STR

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:27 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > Hi, > >> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h >> +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h >> @@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ >> && !defined(CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_STRONG_APA) \ >> && !defined(CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_USER) >> #if defin

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

Hi, --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h > +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h > @@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ > && !defined(CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_STRONG_APA) \ > && !defined(CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_USER) > #if defined(RTEMS_SMP) && _CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS > 1 > -#define

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

This makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:27 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:56 PM Richi Dubey wrote: > > > > Yes. > > > >> You'll want to run a "clean" version also for comparison, to isolate > >> problems you might introduce. > > > > Shouldn't

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:56 PM Richi Dubey wrote: > > Yes. > >> You'll want to run a "clean" version also for comparison, to isolate >> problems you might introduce. > > Shouldn't the clean version give no errors and timeouts? Cause mine does give > failures. > There are sometimes bugs or thin

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

Yes. You'll want to run a "clean" version also for comparison, to isolate > problems you might introduce. Shouldn't the clean version give no errors and timeouts? Cause mine does give failures. On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:02 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 8:55 AM Richi Dubey wr

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 8:55 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > Invalid directory. Sorry for the doubt. > Did you get it working? You'll want to run a "clean" version also for comparison, to isolate problems you might introduce. > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 8:18 PM Richi Dubey wrote: >>> >>> You should run

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

Invalid directory. Sorry for the doubt. On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 8:18 PM Richi Dubey wrote: > You should run all tests that doesn't explicitly configure a scheduler >> with your new implementation. > > I understand. > > >> Maybey add an >> #ifndef CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS >> #define CONFIGURE_

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

> > You should run all tests that doesn't explicitly configure a scheduler > with your new implementation. I understand. > Maybey add an > #ifndef CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS > #define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS 1 > #endif > before the default scheduler selection. This works. I am getting t

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

On 07/09/2020 16:09, Richi Dubey wrote: Did you use rtems-test before? No. I'll do it now. I am individually testing each smp test for now on this patch: You should run all tests that doesn't explicitly configure a scheduler with your new implementation. ---  cpukit/include/rtems/con

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

> > Did you > use rtems-test before? No. I'll do it now. I am individually testing each smp test for now on this patch: --- cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h b/cpukit/include/rte

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

On 07/09/2020 15:54, Richi Dubey wrote: How do I run a mass test? To make sure all tests use this configuration, please rebuild the BSP with all tests enabled. Then use rtems-test to run the tests. Did you use rtems-test before? ___ devel mailing li

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

How do I run a mass test? On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 7:04 PM Richi Dubey wrote: > Thanks for the advice. I'll work on this. > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:28 AM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> On 03/09/2020 17:10, Richi Dubey wrote: >> >> > Any views on this? >> >>

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

Thanks for the advice. I'll work on this. On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:28 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 03/09/2020 17:10, Richi Dubey wrote: > > > Any views on this? > > Sorry for the delay. Did you run the test suite with this scheduler as > the default and ch

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

On 03/09/2020 17:10, Richi Dubey wrote: Any views on this? Sorry for the delay. Did you run the test suite with this scheduler as the default and check how many tests pass? diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h b/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h index 9305fc2d90.

Re: Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

Hi, Any views on this? On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 7:42 PM Richi Dubey wrote: > Hi, > > I am happy to announce the release of the final version of the Strong APA > scheduler. > > The documentation for the scheduler is live at > https://richidubey.github.io/Strong-APA-Documentation/html/ > > Improve

Introducing the Strong APA Scheduler

Hi, I am happy to announce the release of the final version of the Strong APA scheduler. The documentation for the scheduler is live at https://richidubey.github.io/Strong-APA-Documentation/html/ Improvements over the Pre-Release version