Thanks for the advice. I'll work on this. On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:28 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 03/09/2020 17:10, Richi Dubey wrote: > > > Any views on this? > > Sorry for the delay. Did you run the test suite with this scheduler as > the default and check how many tests pass? > > diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h > b/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h > index 9305fc2d90..63f4be4247 100644 > --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h > +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h > @@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ > && !defined(CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_STRONG_APA) \ > && !defined(CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_USER) > #if defined(RTEMS_SMP) && _CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS > 1 > - #define CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_EDF_SMP > + #define CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_STRONG_APA > #else > - #define CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_PRIORITY > + #define CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_STRONG_APA > #endif > #endif > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
