From: Pavel Pisa
Patches required to boot by U-boot
* bsps/arm: CP15 support for flush prefetch buffer and table base control.
* arm/raspberrypi: ensure that RTEMS application image can be started by
U-boot.
Correction of weirdness
* arm/raspberrypi: correct GPIO pin function selection.
*
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Alan Cudmore wrote:
> Chris: The Model B V1.2 should work fine.
>
> I think I have one of each model Raspberry Pi, so I could test just about
> any Pi code.
> I just got my development environment up to date and tested the single core
> Pi ( A+ ) and Pi Zero. I ver
Chris: The Model B V1.2 should work fine.
I think I have one of each model Raspberry Pi, so I could test just about
any Pi code.
I just got my development environment up to date and tested the single core
Pi ( A+ ) and Pi Zero. I verified 4.11 and 4.12 work.
I also updated my RKI image ( github.co
On 27/04/2016 18:53, Pavel Pisa wrote:
I can help in this area but I have only RPi 1 for testing now.
I have a Model B - V1.2. Is this ok?
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello everybody
and especially those who want to work on RPi.
Before this sound of GSoC start, we should think
what should be integrated from YANG Qiao patches.
If you expect that mailbox services would be required
to access VideoCore and boot data then I think
that YANG Qiao work is valuable and
CCing Andre.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Martin Galvan
wrote:
> Hi everyone! Just wanted to check on the status for this project. I
> saw it was accepted for the GSoC 2016 (congratulations Mudit!), and
> would like to know what our workflow will be like. I offered to
> co-m
Hi everyone! Just wanted to check on the status for this project. I
saw it was accepted for the GSoC 2016 (congratulations Mudit!), and
would like to know what our workflow will be like. I offered to
co-mentor it and help with code/documentation reviews, especially for
the SD card parts since I
Hi !
Congratulations to those students who are selected for GSOC 2016. I am honored
to be selected for RTEMS project in GSOC 2016. I am thankful to following
people who helped me to improve my proposal , who have utilized some of
their important time to review my progress :
Joel Sherrill
Gedare
Hello All,
I am very sorry for the late response. I have my exams starting this week,
until the end of the month. I should be able to contribute full-time to the
project during my vacations after the exam.
I have made changes to the document to provide more details about my
approach and deliverab
I am extremely sorry about my rough work. I have gone through coding
conversion. From next time I will strictly follow coding conventions and
publish my work in good way. It seems that I have to generate gpio
interface file for epwm pins same as André Marques used in i2c code for
rpi. Yes it is pos
Hi Vivek,
Awesome progress! Sorry if I missed this, but do you have a GitHub repository,
or some location where we can take a look at your work? I'm excited to see what
changes you've made, even if they are not final yet.
Isaac
On 04/02/2016 10:30 AM, vivek kukreja wrote:
Hi Joel
Sorry for
Please read https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coding/Conventions
carefully including some of the linked pages related to style. Search
back through this mailing list for discussions related to the gpio
framework. Would it be sensible to stick close to the gpio framework
and add pwm to it?
On
Hi Joel
Sorry for the delay in responding and thank you for your comments on my
proposal.
I would like to share my progress so far. I ran the fileio trace example as
described on the Trace Buffering page and started studying rtems-tld. I made
changes so that rtems-tld command auto-generates a
Recently Worth Burruss suggested me function prototype for getting started
to develop PWM driver. I updated my blog
http://punitvara.github.io/rtems%20drivers/2016/02/28/basic-function with
sample functions.
rtems_status_code SetDutyCycle(int subSystemNumber,float HZ, float
DutyCycleA, float Duty
Hi Marcos and all,
As you suggested me I took StarterWare as reference and writing
function prototypes. I hosted my blog for PWM driver development
tracking so I can note down my day to day work and you can easily read
in which direction I am working.
I will update this frequently. You can visit
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:08 AM, punit vara wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:13 PM, punit vara wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:09 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Marcos Díaz
>>> wrote:
Don't forget that TI has some baremetal drivers (StarterWare) for
For prior effort on SD card see
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015/RaspberryPi_peripherals_and_SD_card#SDcardsupport
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> There is another student that i
rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015/RaspberryPi_peripherals_and_SD_card#SDcardsupport
> >>> >>
> >>> >> There is another student that is planning to add USB/NIC support.
> You
> >>> >> would be best served to avoid too much overlap, but if you go for a
&
to avoid too much overlap, but if you go for a
>>> >> different RPi model that may not matter. What specific RPi board do
>>> >> you plan to use?
>>> >>
>>> >> I would guess SD card is only good for the first half of GSoC, so
>>> >
;> >>
>> >> I would guess SD card is only good for the first half of GSoC, so
>> >> you'll need to identify what else you could do. The other periperhals
>> >> (GPIO, i2c, SPI) support have been merged by Andre.
>> >>
>>
in
>> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > I am Mudit Jain, a final year undergraduate student in Electronics and
>> > Communication Engineering at BITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus.
>> >
>> > I wish to apply for GSOC 2016, with RTEMS as the mentori
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am Mudit Jain, a final year undergraduate student in Electronics and
> Communication Engineering at BITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus.
>
> I wish to apply for GSOC 2016, with RTEMS as the mentoring organization.
>
> I have gone through your website for deta
Hi everyone,
I am Mudit Jain, a final year undergraduate student in Electronics and
Communication Engineering at BITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus.
I wish to apply for GSOC 2016, with RTEMS as the mentoring organization.
I have gone through your website for details regarding the development
process
Hi,
With the help from Rock members, I could secure some scripts and
documentation from the previous SOCIS project on Porting Rock on RTEMS.
That caused a lot many changes in my proposal.I request everyone to have a
look and comment. My proposal link is
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ntfj3X4
>> >> >>> Second Half:
>> >> >>> Adding Ethernet Support
>> >> >>> Testing (ARP, PING, DHCP, FTP, TFTP)
>> >> >>> Adding support for lwIP (since it is already ported to BBB, this
>> >> >>> should n
ady ported to BBB, this
> >> >>> should not take more time)
> >> >>>
> >> >> Timeline seems good. Is the USB support available from freebsd for
> the
> >> >> libbsd codebase?
> >> >
> >> > Yes. libbsd has s
ed message --
From: 'Stephanie' via Google Summer of Code Discuss <
google-summer-of-code-disc...@googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:00 AM
Subject: GSoC 2016 Student Proposal Deadline is Friday, March 25th 19:00 UTC
To: Google Summer of Code Discuss <
google-summer-of-
t;> > http://gtament-rtems.blogspot.in/2015/06/my-progress-report.html ).
>> >
>> >>> If we have wifi support in RTEMS, can support of a USB wifi module be
>> >>> added to the project?
>> >>>
>> >> I haven't seen any one us
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:13 PM, punit vara wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:09 PM, punit vara wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Marcos Díaz
>> wrote:
>>> Don't forget that TI has some baremetal drivers (StarterWare) for
>>> beagle bone. You can base your work with it.
>>>
>>> On Tue,
Any further comments are appreciated.
On 18 March 2016 at 15:59, Darshit Shah wrote:
>
>
> On 18 March 2016 at 14:48, Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 18/03/16 14:38, Darshit Shah wrote:
>>
>>> > "schedulable task sets would miss their deadlines since
ttp://gtament-rtems.blogspot.in/2015/06/my-progress-report.html ).
> >
> >>> If we have wifi support in RTEMS, can support of a USB wifi module be
> >>> added to the project?
> >>>
> >> I haven't seen any one using wifi yet.
> >>
>
the project?
>>>
>> I haven't seen any one using wifi yet.
>>
>>> I'd really appreciate any feedback on my deliverables, especially
>>> regarding the feasibility of doing it in this time frame. If there is
>>> anything I may have missed ou
On 21/03/16 15:55, Rahul Goradia wrote:
Is there any other open project related to resource management or
scheduling in which I can contribute?
Due to the SMP work in progress I don't think any resource management or
scheduling related topics are suitable as a GSoC project this year with
the
Thanks for the prompt reply.
Is there any other open project related to resource management or
scheduling in which I can contribute?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> They are already implemented, but since there is currently no use ca
Will implementation of phase fair RW locks be considered in this GSOC?
I know I am very late to ask this question.
I have read the concept and theory of phase fair RW locks from reference
suggested in RTEMS( http://www.mpi-sws.org/~bbb/papers/pdf/rtsj11.pdf)
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Sebas
They are already implemented, but since there is currently no use case
for them, they are not included in the sources.
On 21/03/16 15:29, Rahul Goradia wrote:
Will implementation of phase fair RW locks be considered in this GSOC?
I know I am very late to ask this question.
I have read the conce
On 19/03/16 02:35, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Павел Мовчан wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I want to work with RTEMS and do some work for it.
>I find SMP and "Condition Variables"(status?) is very interesting for me. I
SMP is moving fast right now. Sebastian Huber may have mo
Hi Chris, Isaac
I implemented a C program as Isaac said to parse and understand an example CTF
trace stream based on an input config. It was really helpful to understand the
overall CTF structure. Now im looking at the Capture Engine code to understand
how concurrent buffering is supported and
I have a fundamental question. Is Rock the main issue, or does the
Orocos port that uses RTEMS also need to be updated and verified? Can
you run Orocos/RTEMS?
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> You need to register an account on the wiki, and then edit the page
> (link at bott
You need to register an account on the wiki, and then edit the page
(link at bottom).
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Sambeet Panigrahi
wrote:
> Hi
> I am attaching the link to my proposal with this mail This is not a final
> draft and there's a lot of scope of improvement. I have not yet decid
Hello all,
I want to work with RTEMS and do some work for it.
I find SMP and "Condition Variables"(status?) is very interesting for me. I
can do some work to improve smp locks and synchronization primitives.
"Merge Leon" project also seems interesting.
Maybe community can aim me to right direction
Hi
I am attaching the link to my proposal with this mail This is not a final
draft and there's a lot of scope of improvement. I have not yet decided
what packages to build. I wanted to update the tracking page but don't know
how to do that. I welcome all suggestions for improvement and feedbacks.
h
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Marcos Díaz
wrote:
> Don't forget that TI has some baremetal drivers (StarterWare) for
> beagle bone. You can base your work with it.
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Marcos Díaz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 1
On 16/03/16 22:11, Chris Johns wrote:
On 16/03/2016 23:01, Darshit Shah wrote:
I have updated my draft proposal with a basic timeline for things that
need to be done. The link is shared on the tracking page and has been
submitted via the program website as well. I'm sharing it here as well:
ht
include statement at the earliest.
Regards,
Vivek
From: Chris Johns
Sent: 16 March 2016 10:18
To: Vivek Kukreja; guteku...@gmail.com
Cc: Gedare Bloom
Subject: Re: GSoC 2016 Interested in Tracing was Re:
Hi,
I have reviewed your document but I could no actual pro
On 18 March 2016 at 14:48, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 18/03/16 14:38, Darshit Shah wrote:
>
>> > "schedulable task sets would miss their deadlines since it does not
>> consider
>> > migrating high priority tasks"
>> >
>> > I think this is not correct. The
On 16/03/2016 23:01, Darshit Shah wrote:
I have updated my draft proposal with a basic timeline for things that
need to be done. The link is shared on the tracking page and has been
submitted via the program website as well. I'm sharing it here as well:
https://goo.gl/UmgS61
Since this is a draf
On 18/03/16 14:38, Darshit Shah wrote:
> "schedulable task sets would miss their deadlines since it does not
consider
> migrating high priority tasks"
>
> I think this is not correct. The current APA scheduler should implement
> strong APA. However, it may iterate several times over all (!) re
if the error in
>> the fileio tracing example is resolved and send a patch for the
>> missing include statement at the earliest.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vivek
>>
>>
>> From: Chris Johns
>> Sent: 16 March 2
Vivek
From: Chris Johns
Sent: 16 March 2016 10:18
To: Vivek Kukreja; guteku...@gmail.com
Cc: Gedare Bloom
Subject: Re: GSoC 2016 Interested in Tracing was Re:
Hi,
I have reviewed your document but I could no actual proposal in the
Google Document https://goo.gl/8jRfyV.
I have updated the pro
I have updated my draft proposal with a basic timeline for things that
need to be done. The link is shared on the tracking page and has been
submitted via the program website as well. I'm sharing it here as well:
https://goo.gl/UmgS61
Since this is a draft proposal, it may not be completely polish
Vivek
From: Chris Johns
Sent: 16 March 2016 10:18
To: Vivek Kukreja; guteku...@gmail.com
Cc: Gedare Bloom
Subject: Re: GSoC 2016 Interested in Tracing was Re:
Hi,
I have reviewed your document but I could no actual proposal in the
Google Document https://goo.gl/8jRfyV.
I have updated the pro
On 18 March 2016 at 09:43, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 16/03/16 22:11, Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> On 16/03/2016 23:01, Darshit Shah wrote:
>>>
>>> I have updated my draft proposal with a basic timeline for things that
>>> need to be done. The link is shared o
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:09 PM, punit vara wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Marcos Díaz
> wrote:
>> Don't forget that TI has some baremetal drivers (StarterWare) for
>> beagle bone. You can base your work with it.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Marcos Díaz
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Павел Мовчан wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I want to work with RTEMS and do some work for it.
> I find SMP and "Condition Variables"(status?) is very interesting for me. I
SMP is moving fast right now. Sebastian Huber may have more to say on
whether anything is worth try
Don't forget that TI has some baremetal drivers (StarterWare) for
beagle bone. You can base your work with it.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Marcos Díaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, punit vara wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:24 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:20 PM, punit vara wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:24 PM, punit vara wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:07 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 AM, punit vara wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, punit vara wrote:
>
>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:24 PM, punit vara wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:07 PM, punit vara wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 AM, punit vara wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, punit vara wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ketul Shah wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:07 PM, punit vara wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 AM, punit vara wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ketul Shah wrote:
Hello Punit and all,
According to me, Punit
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 AM, punit vara wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ketul Shah wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Punit and all,
>>>
>>> According to me, Punit you must have completed some gpio test through gpio
>>> API that
On 03/10, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Joel might answer about the state of the scheduling simulator.
@Joel, any thoughts / inputs on the state of the scheduling simulator
would be very helpful. I'm currently trying to come up with a draft
timeline for review, but this is a blocking factor. I've cloned
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Joel might answer about the state of the scheduling simulator.
>
> I believe you eventually have to copy-paste your application into a
> form, so it is better if you stick to plain text. I don't even know if
> you can put images in. You may op
e I should consider as a
>> part of this, I'd be really glad if someone could point that out, so
>> as to increase my chances of selection.
>>
>> A quick question: How can I add my name to the tracking list @
>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2016 ?
>>
&g
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Ankit ladhania
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm a final year student pursuing Bachelors in Computer Science and
> Engineering from Indian School of Mines (IIT), Dhanbad.
>
> I have studied and analyzed RTEMS and I think I would be a good fit for
> "Porting V8 to RTEMS" project
Hi,
I'm a final year student pursuing Bachelors in Computer Science and
Engineering from Indian School of Mines (IIT), Dhanbad.
I have studied and analyzed RTEMS and I think I would be a good fit for
"Porting V8 to RTEMS" project based on the prior experiences in Amazon,
WebEngage and many other p
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Marcos Díaz <
marcos.d...@tallertechnologies.com> wrote:
> Hi, here at Taller we developed some patches for the BBB bsp.
> The idea of the bootloader is good, in order to not depend anymore on
> U-Boot.
> Other possible drivers are I2c, pwm and maybe others. We hav
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Hi Punit,
>
> we have 3 mentors lined up in case we accept any BBB projects.
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:43 PM, punit vara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am ready with RTEMS hello world on Beagle bone black
> > (
> https://www.youtube.com/watch
Hi Punit,
we have 3 mentors lined up in case we accept any BBB projects.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:43 PM, punit vara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am ready with RTEMS hello world on Beagle bone black
> (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyOHU02bsvw&index=6&list=PL2muodf7ZnYcS18wkilESuJpZGj4mYSMJ)
> and inte
part of this, I'd be really glad if someone could point that out, so
> as to increase my chances of selection.
>
> A quick question: How can I add my name to the tracking list @
> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2016 ?
>
You need to register an account to edit the page throu
Hi, here at Taller we developed some patches for the BBB bsp.
The idea of the bootloader is good, in order to not depend anymore on
U-Boot.
Other possible drivers are I2c, pwm and maybe others. We have I2c working
on RTEMS, but using TI StarterWare drivers. you should port them to the
RTEMS bsp.
So
really glad if someone could point that out, so
as to increase my chances of selection.
A quick question: How can I add my name to the tracking list @
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2016 ?
Deval Shah
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:07 AM, André Marques
wrote:
> Hello Jan and Deval,
>
> Às
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Jarielle Catbagan <
jariellecatba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Punit,
>
> I was working on porting the MicroMonitor (uMon) bootloader to the BBB
> last year's GSoC 2015. There is actually still some work that needs to be
> done. At the moment, Ethernet functiona
Hello Punit,
I was working on porting the MicroMonitor (uMon) bootloader to the BBB last
year's GSoC 2015. There is actually still some work that needs to be
done. At the moment, Ethernet functionality and booting application images
still need to be implemented to get it to the point of making i
Hi,
I am ready with RTEMS hello world on Beagle bone black (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyOHU02bsvw&index=6&list=PL2muodf7ZnYcS18wkilESuJpZGj4mYSMJ)
and interested to improve BBB BSP . Currently I am testing GPIO and will
work on PWM driver for showcasing on my proposal. But I am afraid that
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Joel should comment on this. He has been making a recent effort at
> unifying the PCI implementations in the BSP layer. However, we also
> have the new "drvmgr" framework in cpukit/libdrvmgr that supports PCI
> plus a lot of other devices an
Joel should comment on this. He has been making a recent effort at
unifying the PCI implementations in the BSP layer. However, we also
have the new "drvmgr" framework in cpukit/libdrvmgr that supports PCI
plus a lot of other devices and busses.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:19 PM, animesh pathak wrot
Joel might answer about the state of the scheduling simulator.
I believe you eventually have to copy-paste your application into a
form, so it is better if you stick to plain text. I don't even know if
you can put images in. You may optionally link to a generated PDF,
too.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at
Hi,
I've been a little busy with my semester end exams and other things
recently. But I have spent time looking into the RTEMS Priority
Scheduler with Processor Affinities and the paper mentioned in the trac
ticket.
At this point, I have a decent understanding of the paper and its
algorithm
d();
> exit( 0 );
> }
>
The https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/GettingStarted pages asks you to
post to the lists your patch and then update the GSoC 2016 page at
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2016. Can you please do this? Thanks.
>
> I have gone through some recent archives of the
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM, punit vara wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ketul Shah
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Punit and all,
>>
>> According to me, Punit you must have completed some gpio test through
>> gpio API that was merged last year. So till the final result of accepted
>> student
Hi,
Thanks for informing. Another interesting idea on which I would like to
work upon, from the Ideas page is "Unified Interrupts and Devices" . In
case this project is already assigned to someone please suggest me the
project which I can pick up, and can get started with.
Regarding my skills, I ha
Hi Animesh,
I think the condition variables will be fixed by another developer
(Sebastian Huber). Any other projects catch your eye?
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 5:31 AM, animesh pathak wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am Animesh Chandra Pathak.
> I am pursuing my BTech in Computer Science at IIIT Hyderab
On 07/03/2016 10:25, Chris Johns wrote:
For this to happen I would like to see a separate GCC
Plug-In project started and trace support being just one part of it.
To clarify I mean a project within RTEMS for RTEMS.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@
transports. This is
important with custom hardware with restricted external interfaces.
3) CTF integration
Isaac has been looking at this and I hope he considers joining GSoC 2016
to help mentor the Trace project with me (Isaac, hint hint :)).
CTF is really neat and brings to RTEMS a range of
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Ketul Shah wrote:
> Hello Punit and all,
>
> According to me, Punit you must have completed some gpio test through gpio
> API that was merged last year. So till the final result of accepted student
> you can start working with PWM driver that plays an important rol
Hello Punit and all,
According to me, Punit you must have completed some gpio test through gpio
API that was merged last year. So till the final result of accepted student
you can start working with PWM driver that plays an important role for any
embedded project. This would be a good kick-start f
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Pratik Singhal wrote:
> Hello, I am Pratik Singhal 3rd year undergraduate student studying Computer
> Science in India.
> I am interested in working with RTEMS on improving support for Raspberry Pi
> boards as a part of Google summer of code 2016 project.
>
We use I2c but using drivers from TI's baremetal drivers they provide in
their StarterWare software suite.
So, currently we cannot commit that into RTEMS.
But those drivers should be very useful to port to RTEMS.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2
Hi Vivek,
Chris is definitely the person most knowledgeable in this area.
On 03/03/2016 11:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Vivek Kukreja mailto:vivekkukr...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Hi everyone
I am Vivek Kukreja, currently pursuing Masters from India.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Vivek Kukreja
wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
>
> I am Vivek Kukreja, currently pursuing Masters from India. I'm interested
> in applying for GSOC this year. I am a skilled C Programmer and have strong
> understanding of OS concepts. I'm interested in system programming
>
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 05:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On the POSIX Compliance, I have some work in progress that needs to be
>> submitted
>> so don't starting coding without chatting with us. Plenty to do so no
>> worries, just
>> coordination n
On 03/03/2016 05:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On the POSIX Compliance, I have some work in progress that needs to be
submitted
so don't starting coding without chatting with us. Plenty to do so no
worries, just
coordination needed.
As part of defining the work on that project, we will have to help
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Marcos Díaz <
marcos.d...@tallertechnologies.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM, punit vara wrote:
>>
>>> Yes I have checked previous year work of ketul . He has done ADC and
>>> GPIO BS
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM, punit vara wrote:
>
>> Yes I have checked previous year work of ketul . He has done ADC and GPIO
>> BSP . It seems SPI,USB BSP need to be developed as I have checked rtems.git
>> and I am not sure about I2
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM, punit vara wrote:
>
>> Yes I have checked previous year work of ketul . He has done ADC and GPIO
>> BSP . It seems SPI,USB BSP need to be developed as I have checked rtems.git
>> and I am not sure about I2
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:41 PM, punit vara wrote:
> Yes I have checked previous year work of ketul . He has done ADC and GPIO
> BSP . It seems SPI,USB BSP need to be developed as I have checked rtems.git
> and I am not sure about I2C .I asked last year student Ketul .According to
> him , I2c is a
I am interested in following projects apart from BBB BSP :
1. Improve Posix compliance
2. TCP/IP stack update (Please suggest me more readings for this)
What are the prerequisites I need to do to improve my chances ? please let
me know.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Hesham Almatary
wrote:
Yes I have checked previous year work of ketul . He has done ADC and GPIO
BSP . It seems SPI,USB BSP need to be developed as I have checked rtems.git
and I am not sure about I2C .I asked last year student Ketul .According to
him , I2c is also need to be modified. I tried to contact Ben but he is
un
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Hesham Almatary
wrote:
> Hi Punit,
>
> You can have a look at the open projects here [1] and find one or more
> that match your experience/interests.
>
> [1] https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/OpenProjects
>
>
I have added Ben Gras. He knows more about the BBB
Hi Punit,
You can have a look at the open projects here [1] and find one or more
that match your experience/interests.
[1] https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/OpenProjects
Regards,
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:14 PM, punit vara wrote:
> I have asked for BBB BSP proposal before but I haven't fo
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
