Re: Documentation index entries for functions

On 14/10/2022 15:58, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Which way should it be? :) I strongly prefer the () style for functions and macros. I should have mentioned that I also agree with this approach. If we get a third pro-parentheses vote, I'll make a sweep. Thanks, with the newly do

Re: Documentation index entries for functions

On 15/10/2022 12:58 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:53 AM Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: > On 14.10.22 15:45, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > While teaching an RTEMS class this week, I noticed that rtems_build_name > > is i

Re: Documentation index entries for functions

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:53 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 14.10.22 15:45, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > While teaching an RTEMS class this week, I noticed that rtems_build_name > > is in the Classic API Guide index twice. Once with () and once without. > > I

Re: Documentation index entries for functions

On 14.10.22 15:45, Joel Sherrill wrote: While teaching an RTEMS class this week, I noticed that rtems_build_name is in the Classic API Guide index twice. Once with () and once without. I started to fix that one case when I noticed that it appears we are just very inconsistent. (rtemsdocs) [

Documentation index entries for functions

Hi While teaching an RTEMS class this week, I noticed that rtems_build_name is in the Classic API Guide index twice. Once with () and once without. I started to fix that one case when I noticed that it appears we are just very inconsistent. (rtemsdocs) [joel@localhost c-user]$ grep -r index:: |