On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:53 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 14.10.22 15:45, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > While teaching an RTEMS class this week, I noticed that rtems_build_name > > is in the Classic API Guide index twice. Once with () and once without. > > I started to fix that one case when I noticed that it appears we are > > just very inconsistent. > > > > (rtemsdocs) [joel@localhost c-user]$ grep -r index:: | grep rtems_ | > > grep "()$" | wc -l > > 280 > > (rtemsdocs) [joel@localhost c-user]$ grep -r index:: | grep rtems_ | > > grep -v "()$" | wc -l > > 158 > > > > There are 280 index entries with () on a method name and 158 without. > FWIW Some of the 158 without could be rtems_ data types. > > > Which way should it be? :) > > I strongly prefer the () style for functions and macros. > I should have mentioned that I also agree with this approach. If we get a third pro-parentheses vote, I'll make a sweep. > > -- > embedded brains GmbH > Herr Sebastian HUBER > Dornierstr. 4 > 82178 Puchheim > Germany > email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16 > fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht München > Registernummer: HRB 157899 > Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler > Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier: > https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/ >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel