On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:32 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2020 17:27, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 12:25 AM Sebastian Huber
> > wrote:
> >> On 10/11/2020 06:33, Chris Johns wrote:
> >>
> My question is if we really should indent by two levels for the
> c
On 11/11/2020 17:27, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 12:25 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
On 10/11/2020 06:33, Chris Johns wrote:
My question is if we really should indent by two levels for the continuation of
long lines.
And my answer was it depends on what is being indented and wh
On 11/11/2020 17:24, Gedare Bloom wrote:
So: my counter-rule would be "use paranthesis if you think it makes an
expression easier to understand".
Nice. This is guide that does not paint itself into a corner.
Giving some flexibility on additional parens is fine with me. This
kind of rule is ori
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 12:25 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 10/11/2020 06:33, Chris Johns wrote:
>
> >> My question is if we really should indent by two levels for the
> >> continuation of
> >> long lines.
> > And my answer was it depends on what is being indented and why. The block
> > nestin
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:08 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> On 10/11/20 6:38 pm, Thomas Doerfler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 10.11.20 um 06:33 schrieb Chris Johns:
> >> On 9/11/20 5:50 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>> On 09/11/2020 01:52, Chris Johns wrote:
> >>>
> On 6/11/20 7:11 pm, Sebastian Hube
On 10/11/20 6:38 pm, Thomas Doerfler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 10.11.20 um 06:33 schrieb Chris Johns:
>> On 9/11/20 5:50 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 09/11/2020 01:52, Chris Johns wrote:
>>>
On 6/11/20 7:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> ...
Avoid excess parentheses. Learn the operat
Hi,
Am 10.11.20 um 06:33 schrieb Chris Johns:
> On 9/11/20 5:50 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 09/11/2020 01:52, Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/11/20 7:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
...
>>>
>>> Avoid excess parentheses. Learn the operator precedence. rules.
>>
>> Yes, and I think this is a goo
On 10/11/2020 06:33, Chris Johns wrote:
My question is if we really should indent by two levels for the continuation of
long lines.
And my answer was it depends on what is being indented and why. The block
nesting level can also effect what works.
I would like to focus on this particular case.
On 9/11/20 5:50 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 09/11/2020 01:52, Chris Johns wrote:
>
>> On 6/11/20 7:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> for breaking long lines we have currently:
>>>
>>> "Should be replaced with
>
On 09/11/2020 01:52, Chris Johns wrote:
On 6/11/20 7:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
for breaking long lines we have currently:
"Should be replaced with
.. code-block:: c
for (
initialization = statement;
a + really + longish + statement + that + evaluates + to <
On 6/11/20 7:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for breaking long lines we have currently:
>
> "Should be replaced with
>
> .. code-block:: c
>
> for (
> initialization = statement;
> a + really + longish + statement + that + evaluates +
Hello,
for breaking long lines we have currently:
"Should be replaced with
.. code-block:: c
for (
initialization = statement;
a + really + longish + statement + that + evaluates + to <
a + boolean;
another + statement++
) {
z = a + really + longish + statemen
12 matches
Mail list logo
