On 6/11/20 7:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for breaking long lines we have currently:
>
> "Should be replaced with
>
> .. code-block:: c
>
> for (
> initialization = statement;
> a + really + longish + statement + that + evaluates + to <
> a + boolean;
> another + statement++
> ) {
> z = a + really + longish + statement + that + needs +
> two + lines + gets + indented + four + more +
> spaces + on + the + second + and + subsequent +
> lines + and + broken + up + at + operators;
> }
>
> Note that indentations should add 2 nesting levels (4 space characters, not
> tabs)."
>
> Do we really need two indent levels for breaking long lines in block
> statements?
> I would just say that the continuation of a broken line is indented by one
> level. The example would look like this (please note the change in the for
> loop
> "a + boolean"):
>
> .. code-block:: c
>
> for (
> initialization = statement;
> a + really + longish + statement + that + evaluates + to <
> a + boolean;
> another + statement++
> ) {
> z = a + really + longish + statement + that + needs +
> two + lines + gets + indented + four + more +
> spaces + on + the + second + and + subsequent +
> lines + and + broken + up + at + operators;
I sometimes add parentheses to aid indenting:
z = (a + really + longish + stat
....
lines + and + broken + up + at + operators);
Emacs automatically indents to the opening `(`. This is mentioned in the GNU
coding standard. We however have this statement in our standard ...
Avoid excess parentheses. Learn the operator precedence. rules.
Chris
> }
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
