Re: [rtems commit] bsp/lm4f120: Disable unsupported tests

2019-03-05 Thread Chris Johns
On 5/3/19 5:01 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> I thought it was clear that these patches should not be merged. They take >> too broad a stroke and don't make any attempt to resolve the real issue. > > Chris complained that the build problems hinder his work to fix the PowerPC > libdl issues with the

Re: [rtems commit] bsp/lm4f120: Disable unsupported tests

2019-03-04 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Joel, On 04/03/2019 22:43, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi I thought it was clear that these patches should not be merged. They take too broad a stroke and don't make any attempt to resolve the real issue. Chris complained that the build problems hinder his work to fix the PowerPC libdl issues

Re: [rtems commit] bsp/lm4f120: Disable unsupported tests

2019-03-04 Thread Chris Johns
On 5/3/19 8:43 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I thought it was clear that these patches should not be merged. They takeĀ  > too broad a stroke and don't make any attempt to resolve the real issue. > The psxtm* amd tm* tests can easily be made to fit. Most of the offendiing > ones respect an OPERATION_CO

Re: [rtems commit] bsp/lm4f120: Disable unsupported tests

2019-03-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi I thought it was clear that these patches should not be merged. They take too broad a stroke and don't make any attempt to resolve the real issue. The psxtm* amd tm* tests can easily be made to fit. Most of the offendiing ones respect an OPERATION_COUNT define which controls how many objects un