ok to push, thanks
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:48 AM Jiri Gaisler wrote:
>
> > Just one nit, I think we still want to keep
> > - (void) cpu_self;
> > because the variable is unused. This suppresses unused variable warnings.
> I never understood why it was there, but now I know ... :-)
>
> smpfata
Just one nit, I think we still want to keep
- (void) cpu_self;
because the variable is unused. This suppresses unused variable warnings.
I never understood why it was there, but now I know ... :-)
smpfatal08 fails on systems where all cpus are started by the
boot-loader and thereby clobber the
