ok to push, thanks
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:48 AM Jiri Gaisler <j...@gaisler.se> wrote: > > > Just one nit, I think we still want to keep > > - (void) cpu_self; > > because the variable is unused. This suppresses unused variable warnings. > I never understood why it was there, but now I know ... :-) > > smpfatal08 fails on systems where all cpus are started by the > boot-loader and thereby clobber the test output. This patch stops the > secondary cpus with a call to _CPU_Thread_Idle_body(). Tested on RISC-V > and SPARC. > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
