On 02/08/17 21:07, Andreas Kölbl wrote:
Am 02.08.2017 um 15:54 schrieb Sebastian Huber:
On 01/08/17 22:14, Andreas Kölbl wrote:
At the moment I didn't implement smp functionality. I will implement it
directly after implementing SMP.
You can use arm_cortex_a9_get_multiprocessor_cpu_id() in al
On 02/08/2017 23:54, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 01/08/17 22:14, Andreas Kölbl wrote:
>> Am 01.08.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Sebastian Huber:
>>> Why can't you use_CPU_SMP_Get_current_processor() instead of
>>> bsp_get_boot_cpu().
>>>
>>> Why do you have to use the linker command file to allocate memory
Am 02.08.2017 um 15:54 schrieb Sebastian Huber:
> On 01/08/17 22:14, Andreas Kölbl wrote:
>
>> At the moment I didn't implement smp functionality. I will implement it
>> directly after implementing SMP.
>
> You can use arm_cortex_a9_get_multiprocessor_cpu_id() in all
> configurations.
>
> Please
On 01/08/17 22:14, Andreas Kölbl wrote:
At the moment I didn't implement smp functionality. I will implement it
directly after implementing SMP.
You can use arm_cortex_a9_get_multiprocessor_cpu_id() in all configurations.
Please try to use the functions in in your BSP. If
missing, then add
At the moment I didn't implement smp functionality. I will implement it
directly after implementing SMP.
Am 01.08.2017 um 13:08 schrieb Sebastian Huber:
> Why can't you use_CPU_SMP_Get_current_processor() instead of
> bsp_get_boot_cpu().
>
> Why do you have to use the linker command file to alloc
Why can't you use_CPU_SMP_Get_current_processor() instead of
bsp_get_boot_cpu().
Why do you have to use the linker command file to allocate memory for
the command line?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
F
From: Andreas Kölbl
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/jetson-tk1/Makefile.am| 2 ++
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/jetson-tk1/include/cmdline.h | 17 ++
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/jetson-tk1/misc/cmdline.c | 38 ++
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/jetson-tk1/start/start.S | 6 +++-
..