On 11/13/2014 06:35 PM, Alan Cudmore wrote:
This sounds like a nice improvement. Is this intended to be a replacement
for the RTEMS libi2c?
Yes, this is intended as a replacement for libi2c. The big problem with
libi2c is that it is too close to a particular hardware model which
makes bus d
Hi Sebastian,
This sounds like a nice improvement. Is this intended to be a replacement
for the RTEMS libi2c?
Are any updates to existing i2c drivers or code required?
Alan
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> This I2C driver framework
This I2C driver framework has some major differences compared to libi2c.
* It is compatible to the Linux I2C user-space API.
* It uses generic IMFS nodes and thus reduces the levels of indirection.
* The drivers don't have to mess around with minor numbers to get their
state information.
* No
