On 4/8/2022 3:56 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> On 02/08/2022 02:42, chr...@rtems.org wrote:
>> This patch adds a test to make sure threads sleeping on a
>> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME) call are not effected by a
>> change in the realtime clock via the clock_settime(CLOCK_REALTIM
Hello Chris,
On 02/08/2022 02:42, chr...@rtems.org wrote:
This patch adds a test to make sure threads sleeping on a
clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME) call are not effected by a
change in the realtime clock via the clock_settime(CLOCK_REALTIME).
The tests checks the sleeping thread's period using
From: Chris Johns
Closes #4690
---
testsuites/psxtests/psxclock/init.c | 172 +++-
1 file changed, 171 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxclock/init.c
b/testsuites/psxtests/psxclock/init.c
index 2300056f61..743cfa6d78 100644
--- a/testsuite
Hi
This patch adds a test to make sure threads sleeping on a
clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME) call are not effected by a
change in the realtime clock via the clock_settime(CLOCK_REALTIME).
The tests checks the sleeping thread's period using clock ticks.
I have checked the test and Sebastian's p