On 4/8/2022 3:56 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Chris, > > On 02/08/2022 02:42, chr...@rtems.org wrote: >> This patch adds a test to make sure threads sleeping on a >> clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME) call are not effected by a >> change in the realtime clock via the clock_settime(CLOCK_REALTIME). >> >> The tests checks the sleeping thread's period using clock ticks. >> >> I have checked the test and Sebastian's patch on: >> >> arm/xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu >> sparc/erc32 >> aarch64/xilinx_zynqmp_lp64_zu3eg > > I checked in the fix for relative CLOCK_REALTIME sleeps.
Great. I was waiting for you to merge that change before pushing this. :) Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel