Hello Sebastian,
yes, discard that patch.
Best regards
Christian
On 11/02/2020 16:22, Alan Cudmore wrote:
> I believe we can discard this. I am running all of my recent tests
> with the 0x20 RAM origin.
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:06 AM Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
>>
>> He
I believe we can discard this. I am running all of my recent tests
with the 0x20 RAM origin.
Thanks,
Alan
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:06 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I guess that after all the Raspberry Pi changes this patch can be discarded?
>
> On 20/12/2019 07:32, Sebastian Huber
Hello,
I guess that after all the Raspberry Pi changes this patch can be discarded?
On 20/12/2019 07:32, Sebastian Huber wrote:
The RTEMS entry point must be at 0x8000.
Update #3774.
---
bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in | 13 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(
With some further tests that is not absolutely necessary like I first
thought. The raspberry bootloader has a configuration option for setting
the start address: If the following line is added to the config.txt we
can leave the address at 0x0020:
kernel_address=0x0020
See
https://www.rasp
The RTEMS entry point must be at 0x8000.
Update #3774.
---
bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in | 13 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in
b/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in
index d99b4fe23e..fde75877e7 100644
