Hello,
I guess that after all the Raspberry Pi changes this patch can be discarded?
On 20/12/2019 07:32, Sebastian Huber wrote:
The RTEMS entry point must be at 0x8000.
Update #3774.
---
bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in
b/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in
index d99b4fe23e..fde75877e7 100644
--- a/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in
+++ b/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in
@@ -15,11 +15,12 @@
*/
MEMORY {
- RAM_MMU (AIW) : ORIGIN = 0x00100000, LENGTH = @RPI_RAM_MMU_LENGTH@
- RAM (AIW) : ORIGIN = 0x00200000, LENGTH = @RPI_RAM_LENGTH_AVAILABLE@ -
@RPI_RAM_NOCACHE_LENGTH@
+ START (AIW) : ORIGIN = 0x00008000, LENGTH = 0xf8000
+ MMU (AIW) : ORIGIN = 0x00100000, LENGTH = @RPI_RAM_MMU_LENGTH@
+ RAM (AIW) : ORIGIN = 0x00200000, LENGTH = @RPI_RAM_LENGTH_AVAILABLE@ -
@RPI_RAM_NOCACHE_LENGTH@
}
-REGION_ALIAS ("REGION_START", RAM);
+REGION_ALIAS ("REGION_START", START);
REGION_ALIAS ("REGION_VECTOR", RAM);
REGION_ALIAS ("REGION_TEXT", RAM);
REGION_ALIAS ("REGION_TEXT_LOAD", RAM);
@@ -41,9 +42,7 @@ bsp_stack_abt_size = DEFINED (bsp_stack_abt_size) ?
bsp_stack_abt_size : 1024;
bsp_section_rwbarrier_align = DEFINED (bsp_section_rwbarrier_align) ? bsp_section_rwbarrier_align : 1M;
-bsp_vector_table_in_start_section = 1;
-
-bsp_translation_table_base = ORIGIN (RAM_MMU);
-bsp_translation_table_end = ORIGIN (RAM_MMU) + LENGTH (RAM_MMU);
+bsp_translation_table_base = ORIGIN (MMU);
+bsp_translation_table_end = ORIGIN (MMU) + LENGTH (MMU);
INCLUDE linkcmds.armv4
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
