Re: Re: Planning for RTEMS 6 Branch

2020-12-16 Thread small...@aliyun.com
Hi,joel Your reply is helpful and fast as usual. Thanks very much! [email protected] From: Joel Sherrill Date: 2020-12-17 08:44 To: smallphd CC: devel; David Edelsohn Subject: Re: Planning for RTEMS 6 Branch On Wed, Dec 16, 2020, 6:38 PM [email protected] wrote: Hi, joel Our team is

Re: Planning for RTEMS 6 Branch

2020-12-16 Thread small...@aliyun.com
e will be supported by rtems 5.x ? [email protected] From: Joel Sherrill Date: 2020-12-17 03:39 To: [email protected]; David Edelsohn Subject: Planning for RTEMS 6 Branch Hi It took a long time to get from 4.10 to 4.11 and then on to 5. I don't see any reason getting from 5 to 6 should

Is there a way to test all case in real bsp automatically?

2020-11-10 Thread small...@aliyun.com
. [email protected] ___ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Re: rtems-5.1 source code test coverage failed

2020-10-22 Thread small...@aliyun.com
Thank you once again. Your reply is very very fast. [email protected] From: Joel Sherrill Date: 2020-10-23 10:03 To: smallphd CC: devel Subject: Re: Re: rtems-5.1 source code test coverage failed Hit send too soon On Thu, Oct 22, 2020, 8:59 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020

Re: Re: rtems-5.1 source code test coverage failed

2020-10-22 Thread small...@aliyun.com
.html file in which the instructions are listed as "NOT EXECUTED" or executed. The main different is only assembly language is used, while the conventional approach will list the souce code in C language. [email protected] From: Joel Sherrill Date: 2020-10-22 23:49 To: small..

rtems-5.1 source code test coverage failed

2020-10-22 Thread small...@aliyun.com
coverage? Thank you very much! [email protected] ___ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Does anybody have the source code of rtems tools

2020-10-18 Thread small...@aliyun.com
a boot PROM of an ERC32 or LEON system. [email protected] ___ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: RE: I can not run rtems 5.1 smp correctly on bsp xilinx-zynqmp

2020-10-08 Thread small...@aliyun.com
cial care to limit levels on the secondary * are required there. */ arm_cp15_data_cache_invalidate_all_levels(); arm_cp15_branch_predictor_invalidate_all(); arm_cp15_tlb_invalidate(); arm_cp15_flush_prefetch_buffer(); } [email protected] From: Kinsey Moore Date: 2020-10-06

Re: Re: I can not run rtems 5.1 smp correctly on bsp xilinx-zynqmp

2020-10-05 Thread small...@aliyun.com
The board is Ultra96 board with JTAG boot. And yes, there is a bspsmp.c in rtems-5.1\bsps\arm\xilinx-zynqmp\start\ [email protected] From: Gedare Bloom Date: 2020-10-06 00:16 To: [email protected] CC: devel Subject: Re: I can not run rtems 5.1 smp correctly on bsp xilinx-zynqmp It should

I can not run rtems 5.1 smp correctly on bsp xilinx-zynqmp

2020-10-05 Thread small...@aliyun.com
Hi, all I compile rtems 5.1 with bsp xilinx-zynqmp. The single core mode is ok. But I can not use 2 or 3 or 4 cores of this bsp. After analysing the source code, I found there is no code to address smp condition. Does rtems 5.1 indeed not support smp mode for xilinx-zynqmp bsp? small

Re: Re: does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors?

2020-09-18 Thread small...@aliyun.com
Flash disk is used in our normal procedure. We use qspi interface to read and write data from/to a flash disk in order to record our logs. The flash disk is parted to several parts. In such case, a new part could be allocated to save the crash data. [email protected] From: Sebastian Huber

Re: Re: does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors?

2020-09-17 Thread small...@aliyun.com
. Moreover, we need expand the recorded data to get more information of the crash. [email protected] From: Sebastian Huber Date: 2020-09-18 00:00 To: [email protected]; devel Subject: Re: does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors

Re: Re: does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors?

2020-09-15 Thread small...@aliyun.com
. [email protected] From: Chris Johns Date: 2020-09-16 08:33 To: [email protected]; devel Subject: Re: does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors? On 15/9/20 8:58 pm, [email protected] wrote: > I am developing applications in rtems 5.

Re: Re: does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors?

2020-09-15 Thread small...@aliyun.com
of the normal kernel. [email protected] From: Gedare Bloom Date: 2020-09-15 23:26 To: [email protected] CC: devel Subject: Re: does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors? No, there is no facility to generate a core dump. Due to

does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors?

2020-09-15 Thread small...@aliyun.com
whole contents of memory and I could use a debuger to analyse the file to handle the bug. The question arise because I do not want always debug rtems in the bsp. [email protected] ___ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman

Re: Re: Does rtems support pci device in arm architecture?

2020-09-07 Thread small...@aliyun.com
Thank you very much! If anything found, please send me a message. [email protected] From: Sebastian Huber Date: 2020-09-04 16:10 To: [email protected]; devel Subject: Re: Does rtems support pci device in arm architecture? Hello, there is some support for PCI in libbsd. I would have a

Does rtems support pci device in arm architecture?

2020-09-04 Thread small...@aliyun.com
qemu. Does anybody try use rtems to access a pci device in arm platform, especially a qemu environment, as I want use the ivshmem function of qemu. Thank you very much! [email protected] ___ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org

is there a list to diff the rtems 4.x and 5.x

2020-07-26 Thread small...@aliyun.com
. But after I compare the two edition's source code, I find the difference is much more than the document listed. [email protected] ___ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Re: Is rtems available on a 4-cores cortex A72 (ARM-v8a) bsp?

2020-07-24 Thread small...@aliyun.com
xilinx-zynqmp BSP has a ARM cortex A53 processor. Is it a ARMv8-A architeture? [email protected] From: Sebastian Huber Date: 2020-07-24 12:49 To: [email protected]; joel CC: devel Subject: Re: Is rtems available on a 4-cores cortex A72 (ARM-v8a) bsp? On 24/07/2020 03:09, small

Re: Re: Is rtems available on a 4-cores cortex A72 (ARM-v8a) bsp?

2020-07-23 Thread small...@aliyun.com
32-bit mode is OK. Does it fully support SMP and MMU in this bsp? [email protected] From: Joel Sherrill Date: 2020-07-24 00:14 To: Sebastian Huber CC: [email protected]; devel Subject: Re: Is rtems available on a 4-cores cortex A72 (ARM-v8a) bsp? On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 7:25 AM

Is rtems available on a 4-cores cortex A72 (ARM-v8a) bsp?

2020-07-22 Thread small...@aliyun.com
Hello, I have a TI bsp which uses a ARM cortex A72 process. It has 4 cores and MMU enabled. So does rtems support SMP and MMU in such a platform? After searching the mail and source code, I only find a cortex A53 platform. [email protected]

Re: Re: A question about rtems license

2020-07-19 Thread small...@aliyun.com
Thanks both of you for these advice. It is very clear for me now. [email protected] From: Gedare Bloom Date: 2020-07-18 23:49 To: Christian Mauderer CC: [email protected]; devel Subject: Re: A question about rtems license On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 9:20 AM Christian Mauderer wrote