On 2024-06-21 06:27, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello everybody,
I want to inform you about the progress of the project.
The CTU local project project links can be found in the
section CAN/CAN FD Subsystem and Drivers for RTEMS on our page
https://canbus.pages.fel.cvut.cz/#cancan-fd-subsystem-and-dr
On 2023-09-19 09:36, Kinsey Moore wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:25 AM emanuel stiebler <mailto:e...@e-bbes.com>> wrote:
Anybody using CAN on the xilinx MPSoC? Does CON-FD work too?
Hi Emanuel,
Those drivers haven't been ported in from the embeddedsw repository yet
since
On 2023-10-05 12:42, Frank Kühndel wrote:
Hello Emanuel,
I cannot say anything about your specific issue. I can just provide this
information:
Our CI/CD builds rtems-tools with ADA on Ubuntu 22.04 for RSB, Git
commit 35c73203df1e0bc7f0935cfb37ebc6581d8f1103 for aarch64, arm, bfin,
i386, m68
I just tried to compile the tools for rtems6,
and just with "C", everything(?) works.
Trying to add ADA to the tools, it fails, complaining about gnat not
being installed.
In the logfile:
hecking for objdir... .libs
configure: WARNING: using in-tree isl, disabling version check
configure: erro
Hi all,
are there any tools in RTEMS to download the bit stream into the logic
part of the FPGA, after boot?
Thanks!
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Anybody using CAN on the xilinx MPSoC? Does CON-FD work too?
Thanks, Emanuel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2019-02-01 10:08, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As far as I understand, RISC-V does not require any particular alignment
> of data structures in memory. [ ... ]
RISC-V explicitly states somewhere in the manuals, (?) that it supports
unaligned access to memory, but it could be emulated in so
On 2019-01-23 03:34, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we will very likely soon work a BSP for the Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+
> MPSoC platform:
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3682
Excellent!
> Please let me know, if you are interested in support for the Cortex-R5
> processors or AArch64 mode.
Did it move?
both links on the wiki
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Tools/RSB
go nowhere (https://docs.rtems.org/rsb)
Thanks
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
anybody out here uses RTEMS only in the internal RAM of the chip (256k)?
Thanks
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
should it still work, didn't see anything about it for a while on this
list, tried yesterday, and the source-builder failed in newlib:
microblaze-rtems4.11-ar rc ../libc.a *.o
microblaze-rtems4.11-ranlib libc.a
rm -rf tmp
make[8]: Leaving directory
'/cygdrive/d/_home/emu/RTEMS.Work/rte
On 2015-03-17 22:38, Chris Johns wrote:
On 18/03/2015 7:28 am, Chris Johns wrote:
I am testing this now as I needed to add 'merge' to
the git module.
Pushed as
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/commit/?id=b0f9e30fa46a8025b76bf86321ebe585de8972f4
OK, so I managed to compile the toolc
On 2015-03-17 17:37, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 3/17/2015 11:30 AM, emanuel stiebler wrote:
On 2015-03-17 11:41, Chris Johns wrote:> On 17/03/2015 2:48 am, Joel
Sherrill wrote:
>> Hmmm.. copying from the log you attached:
>>
>> This looks like someho
On 2015-03-17 11:41, Chris Johns wrote:> On 17/03/2015 2:48 am, Joel
Sherrill wrote:
>> Hmmm.. copying from the log you attached:
>>
>> This looks like somehow the the contents of
>> ./rtemstoolkit/elftoolchain/libelf/_libelf_config.h are not being
>> tripped by whatever conditionals are set on y
On 2015-03-15 22:19, Chris Johns wrote:
[ back on list ]
Thanks. Can you please try the attached windows.py ?
OK, it seems to build most of the stuff, and fails in the WAF build :(
RTEMS Source Builder - Set Builder, v0.5.0
Build Set: 4.11/rtems-arm
Build Set: 4.11/rtems-autotools.bset
Buil
On 2015-03-15 22:19, Chris Johns wrote:
[ back on list ]
Thanks. Can you please try the attached windows.py ?
Is there a switch, where it doesn't compile everything over and over again?
is the "--no-clean" what I'm looking for?
If it fails, it starts again without compiling
autoconf, aut
On 2015-03-15 22:19, Chris Johns wrote:> [ back on list ]
I wasn't sure, people like to read this long log files ;-)
> Thanks. Can you please try the attached windows.py ?
Sure. It "seems" to work. Is plowing through the sources for hours now ...
Will report, if it really works later ...
RT
On 2015-03-14 00:59, Chris Johns wrote:
On 13/03/2015 7:37 pm, emanuel stiebler wrote:
On 2015-03-13 05:55, Chris Johns wrote:
Have a look in this line ...
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/tree/source-builder/sb/windows.py#n56
.. and remove line 57 and make line 58
On 2015-03-13 05:55, Chris Johns wrote:
Have a look in this line ...
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/tree/source-builder/sb/windows.py#n56
.. and remove line 57 and make line 58 'host_triple = build_triple' so
the host and build names are the same by default.
If this works you mi
On 2015-03-12 02:56, Chris Johns wrote:
I invested a large amount time last year attempting to get cygwin to
build native tools and gave up. I just could not get anything close to
stable and then I really had no idea what I had got cygwin to actually
install (I suspect that is just my lack of kn
On 2015-03-12 02:56, Chris Johns wrote:> On 12/03/2015 4:59 am, emanuel
stiebler wrote:
>> On 2015-03-11 18:40, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/11/2015 12:12 PM, emanuel stiebler wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> should it work at the m
On 2015-03-11 18:40, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 3/11/2015 12:12 PM, emanuel stiebler wrote:
Hi all,
should it work at the moment?
Since Chris is likely the best one to answer that and he won't be
online for at least a a few hours, give it a try. You will know the
answer before he wak
Hi all,
should it work at the moment?
All the best,
emanuel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2014-07-24 03:06, Chris Johns wrote:> On 22/07/2014 1:00 am, emanuel
stiebler wrote:
>> On 2014-07-18 18:54, Chris Johns wrote:
>> >> We still use the U-Boot to load it?
>> > I do not use uboot, rather we have a taken the Xilinx FSBL and
>> reworked it.
On 2014-07-18 18:54, Chris Johns wrote:
>> We still use the U-Boot to load it?
> I do not use uboot, rather we have a taken the Xilinx FSBL and
reworked it.
Could you at least share this part?
And thanks for this already, I thought that I had to use u-boot.
(which I don't mind, it just one more
On 2014-07-18 09:39, Giovanni Macciocu wrote:
Hi Emanuel,
RTEMS has a BSP which is named xilinx_zynq_zedboard, I use the following
configuration to build RTEMS for this BSP.
$ ../configure --target=arm-rtems4.11 --enable-rtemsbsp=xilinx_zynq_zedboard
--prefix=/opt/rtems-4.11 --enable-posix
Hi all,
is there any description how to get RTEMS on the Zynq?
I know how to use RTEMS on ARM, but I'm asking the Zynq specific
parts. On the Wiki, the Zynq BSP is not even mentioned, but I see a lot
of Git commits.
I have a ZedBoard for starters ...
Thanks a lot in advance
27 matches
Mail list logo
