Re: Update and Query regarding "mq_send: thread waiting: no preempt"

please push the changes offered by the patch On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 10:46 PM Shashvat Jain wrote: > Hello > Attached with this is a patch which adds some missing test names in the > /psxtmtests_plan.csv . > > the test case "mq_send: thread waiting: no preempt&quo

Update and Query regarding "mq_send: thread waiting: no preempt"

961681 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 12:09:39 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Update : psxtmtests_plan.csv --- testsuites/psxtmtests/psxtmtests_plan.csv | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/psxtmtests/psxtmtests_plan.csv b/

Closes Ticket#2562

Hello , This closes Ticket #2562 http://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2562 Thank you Regards --Shashvat 0001-Closes-Ticket-2562.patch Description: Binary data ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.

Re: GSOC 2019 Aspirant

Hi Ravindra This link has a list of open projects https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/OpenProjects you can always ask the developers about projects on this list . Thank you for your interest --Shashvat On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:24 PM Ravindra Meena wrote: > Hi, > > I am GSOC aspirant. I am

Re: rtems-docs build failure

Hello Chris I would like to add my problem here . I am unable to properly install sphinx. When I run ./waf Configure , it gives the following error , __ Setting top to : /home/shashvat/rtems-docs Setting out to

Re: need patch for old gcc docs for newer makeinfo was Re: Unable to build m68k arch on 4.9

think the URL for download is >> http://www.multiprecision.org/downloads/mpc-0.8.2.tar.gz >> >> %source set mpc >> http://www.multiprecision.org/downloads/mpc-%{mpc_version}.tar.gz >> >> should work. >> >> --joel >> >> >> >> >> >&g

Re: POSIX Signature Test for sys/uio.h (GCI2018)

Hey Abhimanyu!! please note that all the tests must have the new license BSD-2 . It was added recently . here is the new license https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GCI/Coding/AddPOSIXMethodSignatureComplianceTests if possible ,also submit a patch editing your previous test files with the new license . T

Re: GCI Tasks Staus

0001-Closes-Ticket-2562.patch Hello DrJoel , This was not merged , this patch was to close the ticket #2562 . Thank you Regards Shashvat On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:31 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:

Re: License for psxhdrs files

f code. > > --joel > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:48 PM Shashvat Jain > wrote: > >> that will take some time :) >> the number of methods for which tests are produces are around 300 , i >> suppose >> any other shortcut , like we can make python scripts , li

Re: License for psxhdrs files

one the rtems repo and search for the files you > wrote and licensed. Then replace the license there is with the one on the > link. > > Marçal (Sal) > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:40 PM Shashvat Jain > wrote: > >> How will we edit all the test files to have the new lice

Re: License for psxhdrs files

How will we edit all the test files to have the new license paragraph ? On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:05 AM Shashvat Jain wrote: > yes sir , the psxtmtests also had the license paragraph , same as that of > the compliace tests > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:01 AM Joel She

Re: License for psxhdrs files

yes sir , the psxtmtests also had the license paragraph , same as that of the compliace tests On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:01 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:21 PM Marçal wrote: > >> Hi, >> I think we all have used that license because in the task instructions in >> the w

Unable to build m68k arch on 4.9

Hello , I was trying to build m68k with rtems-source-builder at branch 4.9 but i face an error different than the one described in the ticket #2581 https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2581 One of the dowload links are unavailable , i have attached the log of the report in the attachments..the internet c

psxhdrs: Add POSIX Conformance Test for sys/ipc.h

Hello !! this header file is not present in the newlib I have file a ticket to include it See #3650 the tests for this file are added in this patch Thank you Regards Shashvat From a063c26ad11496739dd742ba8377591a4c2dd1c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 12:13:48

Old TBR pages need to be cleaned

Hello , In this mail I have offered resolution to clean up the TBR section of the wiki , by removing unnecessary pages or by making them into a ticket (+) https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GCI/Coding/AddPerSectionSupportToBSPs I think the process using build_bsp script is old and should be deleted , th

Re: psxhdrs: Add POSIX Conformance Test fot fmtmsg.h (GCI 2018)

gin. > > Thanks. > > --joel > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:56 PM Shashvat Jain > wrote: > >> this is an updated patch. please ignore the above one . >> >> thank you >> >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:34 PM Shashvat Jain >> wrote: >> >&

Re: psxhdrs: Add POSIX Conformance Test fot fmtmsg.h (GCI 2018)

this is an updated patch. please ignore the above one . thank you On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:34 PM Shashvat Jain wrote: > Hello, > The only test for the header file has been added with this patch , > but has been disabled due to the absence of fmtmsg.h header file. > > Updates

psxhdrs: Add POSIX Conformance Test fot fmtmsg.h (GCI 2018)

Hello, The only test for the header file has been added with this patch , but has been disabled due to the absence of fmtmsg.h header file. Updates #3639 Thank you Regards From 4e4341f5c70f3b1c292ab8a6c8b39f07e3caef95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 13:24:13

Re: psxhdrs :Add POSIX API support to

Sorry for sending the patch , I saw that utime.c was not added :( , here is the updated patch . Thank you On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 9:58 AM Shashvat Jain wrote: > Hello , > I just added the test for utime.h header files > the patch for the change has been attached here, > > > T

Re: psxhdrs :Add POSIX API support to

here is the updated patch attached On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 8:28 PM Shashvat Jain wrote: > Hello , > I just added the test for utime.h header files > the patch for the change has been attached here, > > > T

psxhdrs :Add POSIX API support to

Hello , I just added the test for utime.h header files the patch for the change has been attached here, Thank you Regards >From 48d40d771c684af848a26efb1fff8a8d6e110c95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Sat, 1

Re: psxtests: Add POSIX API support to header file

Here is the updated patch On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 11:40 AM Shashvat Jain wrote: > Hello , > I just added the test for utime.h header files > the patch for the change has been attached here, > > > Thank you > Regards > > > --Shashvat > From 4223e9957679a208b63a2

psxtests: Add POSIX API support to header file

Hello , I just added the test for utime.h header files the patch for the change has been attached here, Thank you Regards --Shashvat From 1e3f81f79209606258cfb213396dadb51d1133d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 11:34:07 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] psxtests : Add

Re: Implement POSIX API Signature Compliance Tests for arpa/inet.h File

Hello Abhimanyu, I think we will have to create a directory arpa/inet inside the psxhdrs directory The inet.h file is very much present there , please run the command "man inet" or "man inet.h" inside your rtems source tree , you will get a synopsis about the functions related to this header file.

Re: RTEMS Wiki

Hello Abhimanyu :) The site is now working Good luck for your tasks On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 4:02 PM Abhimanyu Raghuvanshi < abhimanyuraghuvansh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wanted to enquire till when will the RTEMS Wiki remain down? I was working > on some POSIX Api Signature and English Handbook tasks

powerpc/haleakala:Add per-section compilation and linking support(GCI 2018)

Hello , The per-function section linking has been enabled under this patch. with this , we have closed all the tickets related to per-function sections Thank you Regards From f81a18fa7414acca85fbfcb5ba0330eb372704ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:01:50

powerpc/mpc2860ads:Add per-section compilation and linking support(GCI 2018)

t.exe -- Thank you Regards --Shashvat From 31db29936a23b68469fdc52fb384d1235442 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:07:17 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc8260ads:Add per-section compilation and linking support(GCI 2018) The size o

powerpc/qemuppc:Add per-section compilation and linking support(GCI 2018)

Hello , The per-function section linking has been enabled under this patch. Thank you Regards From ee61f922edb80c809713246a3fbb177faac415b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:39:29 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/qemuppc:Add per-section compilation and linking

powerpc/ss555:Add per-section compilation and linking support(GCI 2018)

Hello , The per-function section linking has been enabled under this patch. Thank you Regards From 033daca95f28b8716f518871bd58e793b35e35a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:03:25 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/ss555:Add per-section compilation and linking

Re: [rtems-docs]Ticket #2562 solved , Release version guidelines added (GCI 2018)

please review and push this change On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:01 AM Shashvat Jain wrote: > please push the change > thank you > Regards > > --Shashvat > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:10 PM Shashvat Jain > wrote: > >> Hello , >> this is the updated patch wit

m68k/mrm332:Add per-section compilation and linking support

Hello , The per-function section linking has been enabled under this patch. Thank you Regards From 3a1f5929ec7b66b6e3696b666438ef239485b4b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:39:47 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] m68k/mrm332:Add per-section compilation and linking

m68k/mcf5206elite:Add per-section compilation and linking support (GCI 2018)

Hello , The per-function section linking has been enabled under this patch. Thank you Regards --Shashvat From a44f267fe96bac457b6b5dc4e953b6db87c01e3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shashvat Jain Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 13:32:46 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] m68k/mcf5206elite:Add per-section

Re: m68k/mcf52235:Add per-section compilation and linking support (GCI 2018)

ping On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:13 AM Shashvat Jain wrote: > Hello , > The per-function section linking has been enabled under this patch. > > Thank you > Regards > ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: RTEMS Software Engineering Handbook

Scott has done a awesome job , would love to do the task : ) On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:22 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > Scott Zemerick of NASA IV&V did a review of NASA's quality standard and > DO-178B and tried to find a way for open source projects to provide > documents meeting the spir

m68k/mcf5225x:Add per-section compilation and linking support (GCI 2018)

Hello , The per-function section linking has been enabled under this patch. Drops have been recorded , keeping in mind the host is MSYS2 linux will tend to give a different story , concerning with higher drops. Thank you Regards 0001-m68k-mcf5225x-Add-per-section-compilation-and-linkin.patch Desc

m68k/mcf52235:Add per-section compilation and linking support (GCI 2018)

Hello , The per-function section linking has been enabled under this patch. Thank you Regards 0001-m68k-mcf52235-Add-per-section-compilation-and-linkin.patch Description: Binary data ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman

m68k/mcf5329:Add per-section compilation and linking support (GCI 2018)

Hello , The per-function section linking has been enabled under this patch. Thank you Regards --Shashvat 0001-m68k-mcf5329-Add-per-section-compilation-and-linking.patch Description: Binary data ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems

m68k/mcf5235:Add per-section compilation and linking support (GCI 2018)

Hello , The per-function section linking has been enabled under this patch , I faced permission denied for loopback test which i had fixed by giving "x" attribute to loopback-init.o file . if it happens with you , please enable the permission for this test. and generate a patch which improves this

m68k/mcf5235 : permission denied to a specific test , Why?

Hello, After I enabled the per section support on the mcf5235 bsp , on the initial "make install" it said that permission is denied for loopback-init.o file , while other tests before it were built successfully , so i had to give "chmod +x loopback-init.o" , which solved the problem . The question

m68k/av5282:Add per-section compilation and linking support

Hello, I just enabled the per-function and per-data element section support for the av5282 bsp in m68k architecture . The patch for the change has been attached Thank you Regards --Shashvat 0001-m68k-av5282-Add-per-section-compilation-and-linking-.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [rtems-docs]Ticket #2562 solved , Release version guidelines added (GCI 2018)

please push the change thank you Regards --Shashvat On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:10 PM Shashvat Jain wrote: > Hello , > this is the updated patch with proper title and discription > A new paragraph has been added In the quick start for assisting new users > to build the correct

m68k/uC5282:Add per-section compilation and linking support

Hello, I just enabled the per-function and per-data element section support for the uC5282 bsp in m68k architecture . The patch for the change has been attached Thank you Regards --Shashvat 0001-m68k-uC5282-Add-per-section-compilation-and-linking-.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [m68k/gen68360]Add per-section compilation and linking support

I managed to do " git --amend " here is the updated patch with message "Closes #2566" thank you Regards --Shashvat On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 1:23 PM Shashvat Jain wrote: > Hello , > I just enabled the per-function and per-data element section support for > the gen6

[m68k/gen68360]Add per-section compilation and linking support

Hello , I just enabled the per-function and per-data element section support for the gen68340 bsp in m68k architecture . The patch for the change has been attached anyone who pushes it , please add the message "Closes #2566" I forgot to add it , also please tell me how to edit the message on a com

[m68k/gen68340]Add per-section compilation and linking support

Hello , I just enabled the per-function and per-data element section support for the gen68340 bsp in m68k architecture . The patch for the change has been attached Thank you :) Regards --Shashvat 0001-m68k-gen68340-Add-per-section-compilation-and-linkin.patch Description: Binary data _

[rtems-docs]Ticket #2562 solved , Release version guidelines added (GCI 2018)

Hello , this is the updated patch with proper title and discription A new paragraph has been added In the quick start for assisting new users to build the correct and updated version. Command outputs to the example have also been trimmed and added . If everything looks good please commit it ,or inf

[rtems-docs]Ticket #2562 solved , Release version guidelines added (GCI 2018)

Hello , Here is the patch for the solved Ticket, A new paragraph has been added In the quick start for assisting new users to build the correct and updated version. Command outputs to the example have also been trimmed and added . Thank you , Regards Sent from Mail for Windows 10 _

Re: [POSIX Benchmark Test] psxtmmqrcvblock01 made (GCI 2018)

Glad to help! On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:48 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Thanks for double checking the commit and reporting this. I pushed a fix > and gave you credit. :) > > --joel > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:56 AM Shashvat Jain > wrote: > >> Can someone

Re: [POSIX Benchmark Test] psxtmmqrcvblock01 made (GCI 2018)

Can someone change the status of the test to YES in the plan.csv file ,as it has been commited On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:22 PM Shashvat Jain wrote: > ok , that makes sense > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:20 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> I agree we want to reduce the overall num

Re: [POSIX Benchmark Test] psxtmmqrcvblock01 made (GCI 2018)

cases need to be separate. They are very precise tests and hard to make > sure they measure > exactly what you think they measure without extras. > > --joel > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:30 AM Shashvat Jain > wrote: > >> I asked that before starting to make the test and

Re: [POSIX Benchmark Test] psxtmmqrcvblock01 made (GCI 2018)

I asked that before starting to make the test and Dr. Joel asked me to make a separate one On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:35 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Do we really need separate test programs for all these test cases? Can't > we just add this to psxtmmq01? >

[POSIX Benchmark Test] psxtmmqrcvblock01 made (GCI 2018)

rcvblock01/init.c b/testsuites/psxtmtests/psxtmmqrcvblock01/init.c new file mode 100644 index 00..426795c544 --- /dev/null +++ b/testsuites/psxtmtests/psxtmmqrcvblock01/init.c @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +/* + * COPYRIGHT (c) 2018. + * Shashvat Jain GCI 2018 + * + * Permission to use, copy, modi

Re: Adding Benchmark test for the test case " mq_receive: not available: block"(GCI 2018)

Thank you for the clarification. :) On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:15 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 9:33 PM Shashvat Jain wrote: > >> hello , >> multiple test cases have been defined in a single test >> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/t

Adding Benchmark test for the test case " mq_receive: not available: block"(GCI 2018)

hello , multiple test cases have been defined in a single test https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/psxtmtests/psxtmmq01/psxtmmq01.doc The task instructs me to add a new test , just for clarification , will it be right to add the test case "mq_receive: not available: block" in the same te

Re: arm/csb337 Doxygen Update

Great, thanks! please take a look at the arm/atsam bsp doxygen update. On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 3:08 AM Chris Johns wrote: > On 10/11/2018 15:55, Shashvat Jain wrote: > > the patch in the attachment gives doxygen header to files in the > csb337/include > > diectory > >

Re: "ARM/atsam" Doxygen Update

Hello , someone please review this or push it. On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 9:55 PM Shashvat Jain wrote: > all the files on this link : > > > https://github.com/joelsherrill/gci_tasks/blob/master/2018/doxygen_c_header_tasks/file_lists/arm_atsam_Add_Doxygen_Headers_Task_00.txt > >

arm/csb337 Doxygen Update

the patch in the attachment gives doxygen header to files in the csb337/include diectory please check the changes made and if everything looks right , approve it. --Shashvat From 2e97a591f851c279774ff981312e4d87ac482992 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: shashvatjain Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 23:46:27 +0

BSP: "ARM/csb337" Doxygen Update

the files on this page are to be given Doxygen Header : https://github.com/joelsherrill/gci_tasks/blob/master/2018/doxygen_c_header_tasks/file_lists/arm_csb337_Add_Doxygen_Headers_Task_00.txt i will name a group AT91RM9200 which will include all the files whose name starts from "at91rm9200" is th

"ARM/atsam" Doxygen Update

all the files on this link : https://github.com/joelsherrill/gci_tasks/blob/master/2018/doxygen_c_header_tasks/file_lists/arm_atsam_Add_Doxygen_Headers_Task_00.txt have been given a Doxygen header , please commit this into the main repository , the patch is given in the attachment. 0001-arm-ats

Doxygen Update "arm/atsam"

Here is the patch in the attachment adding Doxygen header to specified.h files at this link https://github.com/joelsherrill/gci_tasks/blob/master/2018/doxygen_c_header_tasks/file_lists/arm_atsam_Add_Doxygen_Headers_Task_00.txt I cannot find header in "/arm/atsam/include/bsp.h" in my source tree , d