that will take some time :) the number of methods for which tests are produces are around 300 , i suppose any other shortcut , like we can make python scripts , like Gedare and Joel did to generate tasks .
Shashvat On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:12 AM Marçal <mcomajoanc...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you just have to clone the rtems repo and search for the files you > wrote and licensed. Then replace the license there is with the one on the > link. > > Marçal (Sal) > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:40 PM Shashvat Jain <shashvatjain2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> How will we edit all the test files to have the new license paragraph ? >> >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:05 AM Shashvat Jain < >> shashvatjain2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> yes sir , the psxtmtests also had the license paragraph , same as that >>> of the compliace tests >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:01 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:21 PM Marçal <mcomajoanc...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I think we all have used that license because in the task instructions >>>>> in the wiki ( >>>>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GCI/Coding/AddPOSIXMethodSignatureComplianceTests) >>>>> says so. Do I change the wiki to the new license? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>> And are the psxtmtests templates and tests the short license or the >>>> BSD-2? They may also be impacted. >>>> >>>> Marçal (Sal) >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:13 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think I have cc'ed all of the GCI students who submitted code to >>>>>> psxhdrs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sebastian has asked that these files have 2 paragraph BSD which is >>>>>> quite >>>>>> similar to this one and makes the license consistent with other >>>>>> files. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause >>>>>> >>>>>> I am in the process of merging the last GCI tasks in this category. >>>>>> Please submit >>>>>> a patch for all the files you wrote. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sebastian.. if I missed anyone, please reply and bring them in. Also >>>>>> just help >>>>>> get this resolved. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> --joel >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:16 AM Sebastian Huber < >>>>>> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 09/12/2018 22:41, Marçal Comajoan Cara wrote: >>>>>>> > + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this >>>>>>> software >>>>>>> > + * for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted. >>>>>>> > + * >>>>>>> > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL >>>>>>> > + * WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED >>>>>>> > + * WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL >>>>>>> THE AUTHOR >>>>>>> > + * BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL >>>>>>> DAMAGES >>>>>>> > + * OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR >>>>>>> PROFITS, >>>>>>> > + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER >>>>>>> TORTIOUS ACTION, >>>>>>> > + * ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE >>>>>>> OF THIS SOFTWARE. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would it be possible to change this to BSD-2-Clause? New files >>>>>>> written >>>>>>> specifically for RTEMS should have the standard project license and >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> is BSD-2-Clause from my point of view. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany >>>>>>> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 >>>>>>> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 >>>>>>> E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >>>>>>> PGP : Public key available on request. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> devel mailing list >>>>>>> devel@rtems.org >>>>>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>>>>> >>>>>>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
