On 1/8/2023 1:46 pm, Alex White wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on RTEMS dynamic loader support for MicroBlaze. I got
> most of the dynamic loader tests working, but for a few of them, I had to
> modify the test. I believe the failures are because the MicroBlaze RTEMS port
> uses soft f
Hi,
I am currently working on RTEMS dynamic loader support for MicroBlaze. I got
most of the dynamic loader tests working, but for a few of them, I had to
modify the test. I believe the failures are because the MicroBlaze RTEMS port
uses soft floating point emulation. Tests dl07, dl08, and dl09
On 31/7/2023 5:14 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 29.07.23 08:30, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> I think this is not really related to the new
>>> RTEMS_VERSION_VC_KEY/RTEMS_VERSION_CONTROL_KEY option. The purpose of this
>>> option is to give users the ability to define their own version control key.
>>
>
Folks,
this patch revert was missing in Gedare's series of reverting CAN-based
patches in preparation for RTEMS 6 release. Due to this all beagleboard
based BSPs fail to build due to error like:
Failures:
1 debug arm/beagleboardorig build:
configure: /export/home/rtems/git/rtems/
On 29.07.23 08:30, Chris Johns wrote:
I think this is not really related to the new
RTEMS_VERSION_VC_KEY/RTEMS_VERSION_CONTROL_KEY option. The purpose of
this option is to give users the ability to define their own version
control key.
I think we are broadly aligned however there are differ
