Re: Enabling Buildbot 'responsible user' emails.

On 2020-02-08 09:31 +1100, Chris Johns wrote: > >https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/amar/test1.jpg > > > > That is flash. :) Heh thanks, I set this up in August 2019 and it's been nagging at me since. > You are not alone getting to this point. I know OAR has been setting > something u

Re: Enabling Buildbot 'responsible user' emails.

On 2020-02-08 06:59, Amar Takhar wrote: I actually have a test system I started building over the summer: https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/amar/test1.jpg That is flash. :) Made up of Beaglebone and RPIs. Eventually I will get around to setting this up I already put a lot of work

Re: Enabling Buildbot 'responsible user' emails.

On 2020-02-07 09:02 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Currently, the build buildbot just build the BSPs with the tests. A next > step could be to add test suite runs as well. It is a lot more easy to > debug failures on one of the simulator BSPs even though they are not tier 1. I actually have a t

Re: [rtems-docs PATCH v2] user/testing: Add coverage analysis instructions

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:41 AM Chris Johns wrote: > On 4/2/20 10:26 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > looks OK to me. > > +1 from me. > > Thanks > Chris > Thanks for the reviews! Can you please push this :) ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists

Re: About Beaglebone Black device tree

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:21 PM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 02/02/2020 18:34, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 9:49 PM Christian Mauderer > > wrote: > > > > > > On 31/01/2020 17:43, Vijay K

[PATCH v3 3/3] i386: Port to RTEMS

- Update imported files to compile rtems-libbsd for i386 based BSPs - Currently does not support the option "dev_nic_e1000 = on" --- freebsd/sbin/sysctl/sysctl.c | 10 +- freebsd/sys/dev/pci/pci_pci.c |2 + freebsd/sys/i386/i386/legacy.c | 381 ---

[PATCH v3 1/3] i386: Add missing files from FreeBSD

- Files needed to make rtems-libbsd build again for i386 --- freebsd/sys/i386/include/machine/bus.h| 6 + .../sys/x86/include/machine/intr_machdep.h| 175 freebsd/sys/x86/include/machine/legacyvar.h | 73 freebsd/sys/x86/include/machine/metadata.h| 57 +++ freeb

[PATCH v3 2/3] i386: Add to build

--- libbsd.py | 7 +-- waf_libbsd.py | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/libbsd.py b/libbsd.py index bd24cd61..3823c03f 100644 --- a/libbsd.py +++ b/libbsd.py @@ -1556,6 +1556,8 @@ class dev_nic(builder.Module): 'sys/i386/include/specialr

[PATCH v3 0/3] [rtems-libbsd] Fix compilation fo i386

Hello, I assembled a patch set which enabled building rtems-libbsd for i386-based BSPs again (currently without dev_nic_e1000 enabled). It's my first patch set for rtems-libbsd, but I tried to follow the contribute guidelines as close as possible I also have a similar patchset for amd64 in pre

Re: Enabling Buildbot 'responsible user' emails.

On 07/02/2020 08:51, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/02/2020 00:11, Chris Johns wrote: On 6/2/20 10:00 am, Amar Takhar wrote: On 2020-02-06 08:31 +1100, Chris Johns wrote: Can we enable this for one BSP from each tier 1 architectures? Yes, can you provide a list? The master list is here ...