Re: New Build System Status

2019-11-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 26/11/2019 02:11, Chris Johns wrote: I am saying I have no system to prove it right now. I think it is still needed but can't reproduce it. I don't like removing it quietly without a replacement to detect and report something to a user that X occurred, please report so we know what hosts this

Re: New Build System Status

2019-11-25 Thread Chris Johns
On 26/11/19 11:55 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, 6:30 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > On 26/11/19 10:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:28 PM Chris Johns > >

Re: New Build System Status

2019-11-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, 6:30 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 26/11/19 10:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:28 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > On 26/11/19 9:57 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 3:19 PM Chris Johns >

Re: New Build System Status

2019-11-25 Thread Chris Johns
On 26/11/19 10:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:28 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > On 26/11/19 9:57 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 3:19 PM Chris Johns > >

Re: New Build System Status

2019-11-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:28 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 26/11/19 9:57 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 3:19 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > On 26/11/19 8:05 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 2:12 AM Sebastian Huber > >

Re: New Build System Status

2019-11-25 Thread Chris Johns
On 26/11/19 9:57 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 3:19 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 26/11/19 8:05 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 2:12 AM Sebastian Huber > > >

Re: New Build System Status

2019-11-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 3:19 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 26/11/19 8:05 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 2:12 AM Sebastian Huber > > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> > > wrote: > > > > On 25/11/2019 08:55, Chris Johns wrote: > > > > > > On 25/11/19 5:28 pm, Seba

Re: [PATCH] libtests/dl*: Rename source files

2019-11-25 Thread Chris Johns
On 26/11/19 1:44 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Rename source files to use a %.c -> %.o and %.cc -> %.o pattern. Use > *.cc for C++ source files instead of *.cpp to be in line with other C++ > source files. Thank you for change, it is a nice clean up. Chris

Re: New Build System Status

2019-11-25 Thread Chris Johns
On 26/11/19 8:05 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 2:12 AM Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: > > On 25/11/2019 08:55, Chris Johns wrote: > > > > On 25/11/19 5:28 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> > >> On 24/11/2019 23:25, Ch

Re: New Build System Status

2019-11-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 2:12 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 25/11/2019 08:55, Chris Johns wrote: > > > > On 25/11/19 5:28 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> > >> On 24/11/2019 23:25, Chris Johns wrote: > > Should there be a note or something about waf needing

Re: No program named Python

2019-11-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
Centos 7: $ type python python is /usr/bin/python $ python --version Python 2.7.5 $ type python2 python2 is /usr/bin/python2 $ type python3 bash: type: python3: not found On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 8:41 AM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Am 02.10.18 um 13:20 schr

[PATCH] libtests/dl*: Rename source files

2019-11-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
Rename source files to use a %.c -> %.o and %.cc -> %.o pattern. Use *.cc for C++ source files instead of *.cpp to be in line with other C++ source files. Update #3818. --- testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am| 58 +++--- testsuites/libtests/dl01/{dl-o1.c => dl01-o

Re: [PATCH] psxinttypes01: Remove invalid test cases

2019-11-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
The scn file will be incorrect after this change. The doc file may be as well. On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, 2:40 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > The functions expect a valid string as input according to POSIX. On > systems with a NULL pointer protection the test cases

[PATCH] Updated docs to use the standalone SIS simulator, instead of GDB inbuilt SIS for the erc32 BSP.

2019-11-25 Thread G S Niteesh
--- user/start/bsp-test.rst | 4 +- user/tools/tester.rst | 144 2 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/start/bsp-test.rst b/user/start/bsp-test.rst index 5278375..aefeeb9 100644 --- a/user/start/bsp-test.rst +++ b/user/s

[PATCH] libtests/dl*: Use rtems_tarfs_load()

2019-11-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
Use rtems_tarfs_load() instead of Untar_FromMemory() to reduce the memory demands of the tests. --- testsuites/libtests/dl01/init.c | 4 ++-- testsuites/libtests/dl02/init.c | 4 ++-- testsuites/libtests/dl04/init.c | 4 ++-- testsuites/libtests/dl05/init.c | 4 ++-- testsuites/lib

[PATCH] psxinttypes01: Remove invalid test cases

2019-11-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
The functions expect a valid string as input according to POSIX. On systems with a NULL pointer protection the test cases ended up in exceptions. --- testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c | 20 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01

Re: New Build System Status

2019-11-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 25/11/2019 08:55, Chris Johns wrote: On 25/11/19 5:28 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 24/11/2019 23:25, Chris Johns wrote: Should there be a note or something about waf needing python and we recommend python3? Plus waf needs a `python` installed and not just `python2` or `python3`? I think