On 26/11/2019 02:11, Chris Johns wrote:
I am saying I have no system to prove it right now. I think it is still needed
but can't reproduce it.
I don't like removing it quietly without a replacement to detect and report
something to a user that X occurred, please report so we know what hosts this
happens on.
What happens with the new build system and waf as it now requires a valid
python? This is the point Sebastian is making and it is a valid one. We also
have rtems-tools and libbsd which already exist and have the same issue.
I think this RSB extra Python handling is superfluous. The rtems-tools
are included in the standard RTEMS Tools build. The rtems-tools are
built with waf which uses:
head -n 1 waf
#!/usr/bin/env python
So, if the RSB extra Python handing is necessary, then the rtems-tools
build will fail. I think the waf developers tried hard to meet minimal
platform requirements. It should be all right if we do it like waf.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
