Thank you.
This is now pushed.
Does a ticket need to be updated for this? I am having trouble remembering
how we tracked what .h files still needed work.
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 2:02 PM Jacob Shin wrote:
> ---
> testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 11
> .../psxtests/psxhdrs/te
U_LOCK(hlock);
>> ^
>>
>> /home/dev/kernel/rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/libfs/src/nfsclient/src/rpcio.c:204:54:
>> note: in definition of macro 'MU_LOCK'
>> #define MU_LOCK(mutex) rtems_recursive_mutex_lock(&(mutex))
>>
de status;
>^~
> /home/dev/kernel/rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/libfs/src/nfsclient/src/rpcio.c:
> In function 'rpcUdpXactPoolCreate':
>
> /home/dev/kernel/rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/libfs/src/nfsclient/src/rpcio.c:1508:19:
&g
This BSP builds for me off the master. There are multiple variants within
this
BSP family and various configurations you could have used. Could you
share your configure command?
Mine was:
../rtems/configure --target=arm-rtems5
--enable-rtemsbsp=tms570ls3137_hdk_sdram
--prefix=/home/joel/rtems-w
Hello everyone,
I am new to RTEMS, and was trying to build a new bsp for RTEMS 5 for tms570
family of boards.
While doing the make, i come across this error.
I had done --enable-tests in the previous command.
Can anyone help me with this? Output from terminal is shown below.
( represent so
What is best practice to change build behavior? e.g. I need to use
--whole-archive/--no-whole-archive in one place but --gc-sections breaks it and
that's turned on for the BSP (xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu).
I’ve done this in the .cfg files for the BSP:
ifneq ($(RTEMS_GC_SECTIONS_DISABLE),1)
LDFLAGS_GC
