Re: Update and Query regarding "mq_send: thread waiting: no preempt"

This is now pushed. Thanks. On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 11:16 AM Shashvat Jain wrote: > Hello > Attached with this is a patch which adds some missing test names in the > /psxtmtests_plan.csv . > > the test case "mq_send: thread waiting: no preempt" should be made under a > different test name or with

Re: Requirement Management tools

Hi Jose, Thank you for the email and the introduction. Welcome. On 12/3/19 12:24 am, Jose Valdez wrote: > Currently I have been investigating myself and also requested Sebastian Huber > for some tools he knows. With this information I am building an excel sheet > with > the summarized informatio

Re: Doxygen Groups for cpukit

On 11/03/2019 15:49, Joel Sherrill wrote: FWIW I think there are still a few POSIX header files in cpukit. Do we want all to migrate to newlib? What's the rule if we don't? I would move all POSIX header files to Newlib and try to share them with Cygwin. This exposes our header files to all p

Re: Doxygen Groups for cpukit

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019, 9:36 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:28 AM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> On 07/03/2019 21:57, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:55 PM Chris Johns > > > wrote: >> > >> >

Re: Doxygen Groups for cpukit

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:28 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 07/03/2019 21:57, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:55 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > On 8/3/19 3:24 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 07/03/2019

Re: Beagleboard BSP Framebuffer

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 7:31 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > The MINIX license is BSD with advertising clause as I read it. That is > less preferable to a 2-paragraph BSD license that you are likely to find in > Freebase. Try there. > > The license is fine if you find nothing else. I assume Joel meant

Re: Requirement Management tools

Thanks Jose. I think we would like reports to be in Rest so we can use Sphinx and include them with the RTEMS Documentation Suite. I doubt any of the tools will meet this requirement. I posted just before this that if we go with Doorstop, I can see adding this capability. I like the concept of m

Re: Requirement Management tools

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:50 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 11/03/2019 13:42, Jose Valdez wrote: > > Concerning the Requirements Management Tool, do you would find useful > that the tool selected for RTEMS SMP to be compatible with the ReqIf > standard? What d

Requirement Management tools

Hello all, I am José Valdez from EDISOFT. I am working for the RTEMS SMP project which aims to pre-qualify RTEMS SMP for space missions. I am investigating tools which may partially automate the software development process, i.e: Requirements Management, Design and Unit test tools and source

Re: Requirement Management tools

On 11/03/2019 13:42, Jose Valdez wrote: Concerning the Requirements Management Tool, do you would find useful that the tool selected for RTEMS SMP to be compatible with the ReqIf standard? What do you think? An export to ReqIF would be useful I guess. I am not sure if we want to use it as an