On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:50 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 11/03/2019 13:42, Jose Valdez wrote: > > Concerning the Requirements Management Tool, do you would find useful > that the tool selected for RTEMS SMP to be compatible with the ReqIf > standard? What do you think? > > An export to ReqIF would be useful I guess. I am not sure if we want to > use it as an internal format, e.g to manage the requirements. > The commercial tool we have been looking at for a non-RTEMS project with certification requirements can import a number of formats including ReqIF and CVS. My gut feeling is that if Doorstop is sufficient and this becomes an issue, we can add a ReqIF exporter to it. Chris already mentioned to me privately that adding a Rest output format to it would be desirable so we get the Requirements documents in our native documentation format rather than in just its own HTML reports. In general, if we adopt Doorstop, we will find ourselves helping improve it to suit our needs. --joel > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
