Re: Status of RISCV port on sis

On 07/01/2019 16:38, Jiri Gaisler wrote: On 1/7/19 3:55 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/01/2019 15:47, Jiri Gaisler wrote: On 1/7/19 3:31 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/01/2019 15:21, Jiri Gaisler wrote: The sp37 test fails with an interesting error:    *** BEGIN OF TEST SP 37 *** ] ***

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Remove build date from first page

> On 8 Jan 2019, at 5:19 pm, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > >> On 08/01/2019 02:59, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 7/1/19 11:30 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/01/2019 12:49, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/01/2019 12:39, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 7 Jan 2019, at 10:03 pm, Sebastian Huber

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Remove build date from first page

On 08/01/2019 02:59, Chris Johns wrote: On 7/1/19 11:30 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/01/2019 12:49, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/01/2019 12:39, Chris Johns wrote: On 7 Jan 2019, at 10:03 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds. -1 I prefer a bu

[PATCH] psxhdrs: Add POSIX API Signature Compliance Tests for errno.h

--- testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/errno/errno.c | 44 +++ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) create mode 100755 testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/errno/errno.c diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/errno/errno.c b/testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/errno/errno.c new file mode 100755 index

Re: [PATCH] 6: Add unstable RTEMS 6 tool chain

On 7/1/19 11:58 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > I was able to build all tools except epiphany on a FreeBSD 11 machine. I built > the erc32 BSP and did a test run. One problem was this: > > rtems-test --rtems-bsp=erc32 --rtems-tools=/opt/rtems/6 > /home/user/build/b-erc32 > RTEMS Testing - Tester, 5.

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Remove build date from first page

On 7/1/19 11:30 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 07/01/2019 12:49, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 07/01/2019 12:39, Chris Johns wrote: On 7 Jan 2019, at 10:03 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds. >>> -1 >>> >>> I prefer a build date be

Re: Status of RISCV port on sis

On 1/7/19 3:55 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 07/01/2019 15:47, Jiri Gaisler wrote: >> On 1/7/19 3:31 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 07/01/2019 15:21, Jiri Gaisler wrote: The sp37 test fails with an interesting error:    *** BEGIN OF TEST SP 37 *** ] *** TEST VERSION:

Re: Status of RISCV port on sis

On 07/01/2019 15:47, Jiri Gaisler wrote: On 1/7/19 3:31 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/01/2019 15:21, Jiri Gaisler wrote: The sp37 test fails with an interesting error:   *** BEGIN OF TEST SP 37 *** ] *** TEST VERSION: 5.0.0.eba55a6ad63a1433f50ba0d627394f447bacd04f-modified ] *** TEST STATE

Re: Status of RISCV port on sis

On 1/7/19 3:31 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 07/01/2019 15:21, Jiri Gaisler wrote: >> The sp37 test fails with an interesting error: >> >>   *** BEGIN OF TEST SP 37 *** >> ] *** TEST VERSION: >> 5.0.0.eba55a6ad63a1433f50ba0d627394f447bacd04f-modified >> ] *** TEST STATE: EXPECTED-PASS >> ] *** T

Re: Status of RISCV port on sis

On 07/01/2019 15:21, Jiri Gaisler wrote: The sp37 test fails with an interesting error:  *** BEGIN OF TEST SP 37 *** ] *** TEST VERSION: 5.0.0.eba55a6ad63a1433f50ba0d627394f447bacd04f-modified ] *** TEST STATE: EXPECTED-PASS ] *** TEST BUILD: RTEMS_NETWORKING RTEMS_POSIX_API ] *** TEST TOOLS: 9

Status of RISCV port on sis

I have now made a bsp for a RISCV/GRLIB system, and have been running the testsuite on sis/RISCV. I have a few remaining failures: $ rtems-test --rtems-bsp=riscv-sis riscv-rtems5/c/grlib/testsuites --log=all.txt Passed:    569 Failed:  5 User Input:  5 Expected Fail:   0 Indetermi

Re: arm-rtems5-g++ -std=c++11 and -std=c++0x support

Please try the current master with up to date tools. I think a Newlib update was necessary for this. On 07/01/2019 14:54, Misra, Avinash wrote: Hi Sebastian, Thanks for letting me know. Do you know which version fixes this? I’m currently using commit fdd3b85022b3fb9484f36e3b4cf755b584093cb1

RE: arm-rtems5-g++ -std=c++11 and -std=c++0x support

Hi Sebastian, Thanks for letting me know. Do you know which version fixes this? I’m currently using commit fdd3b85022b3fb9484f36e3b4cf755b584093cb1 I believe. Thanks, Avi From: Mikhail Svetkin Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 4:17 AM To: Sebastian Huber Cc: Misra, Avinash ; rtems-de...@rtems.or

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Remove build date from first page

On 07/01/2019 14:43, Joel Sherrill wrote: We need some indication for automated builds on RTEMS.org that the server actually did build something. The script that builds the docs on the server should create a file and put the build time in it. Built something is good, but built the right thing

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Remove build date from first page

We need some indication for automated builds on RTEMS.org that the server actually did build something. The script that builds the docs on the server should create a file and put the build time in it. On Mon, Jan 7, 2019, 5:04 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote: > The u

Re: [PATCH] 6: Add unstable RTEMS 6 tool chain

I was able to build all tools except epiphany on a FreeBSD 11 machine. I built the erc32 BSP and did a test run. One problem was this: rtems-test --rtems-bsp=erc32 --rtems-tools=/opt/rtems/6 /home/user/build/b-erc32 RTEMS Testing - Tester, 5.0.not_released  Command Line: /opt/rtems/6/bin/rtems

[PATCH] build: Call rtems-ld with the $(CC) of the build

This enables support for non-standard compiler names, e.g. sparc-rtems6-gcc. --- testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am b/testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am index 467c8a28d0..37bfd77e0c 100644 --- a/test

[PATCH] build: Call rtems-syms with the $(CC) of the build

This enables support for non-standard compiler names, e.g. sparc-rtems6-gcc. --- testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am b/testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am index 810f65db8e..467c8a28d0 100644 --

[PATCH] Extend delay in PSXFILE01 test with one tick

Checking of atime in psxfile01 (line 713) can fail since a delay for rtems_clock_get_ticks_per_second (line 699) gives a delay of less than one second, depending on when the last tick occurred. atime is measured in whole seconds, and a fast processor might read the file before a new second occurs.

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Remove build date from first page

On 07/01/2019 12:49, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/01/2019 12:39, Chris Johns wrote: On 7 Jan 2019, at 10:03 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds. -1 I prefer a build date being present. For unreleased it marks the online builds and for release

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Remove build date from first page

On 07/01/2019 12:39, Chris Johns wrote: On 7 Jan 2019, at 10:03 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds. -1 I prefer a build date being present. For unreleased it marks the online builds and for releases it tags the day built. Adding the Git commi

Re: [PATCH 1/6] Remove build date from first page

> On 7 Jan 2019, at 10:03 pm, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds. -1 I prefer a build date being present. For unreleased it marks the online builds and for releases it tags the day built. I have never seen this being a requirement for docs

[PATCH 6/6] user: Rework overview

Move "Overview", "Real-time Applicaiton Systems" and "Real-time Executive" chapters as sections into new "Introduction" chapter. Add "Feature" section. --- user/glossary/index.rst | 59 +- user/overview/index.rst | 203 +--- user/start/inde

[PATCH 5/6] Update header.rst

Remove trailing slashes in URLs. Fix bug reporting URL. --- common/header.rst | 20 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/header.rst b/common/header.rst index 1b34cb1..e0dcfe7 100644 --- a/common/header.rst +++ b/common/header.rst @@ -7,17 +7,

[PATCH 4/6] Add common header.rst to reduce copy and paste

--- bsp-howto/index.rst| 24 +--- c-user/index.rst | 24 +--- common/header.rst | 23 +++ cpu-supplement/index.rst | 24 +--- develenv/index.rst | 24 +--- eclip

[PATCH 1/6] Remove build date from first page

The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds. --- common/conf.py | 25 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/conf.py b/common/conf.py index 60db066..8d5e6b8 100644 --- a/common/conf.py +++ b/common/conf.py @@ -1,26 +1,3 @@ -import

[PATCH 2/6] Update general copyright notice

Update year and add "and contributors". --- common/conf.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/common/conf.py b/common/conf.py index 8d5e6b8..5be4568 100644 --- a/common/conf.py +++ b/common/conf.py @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ master_doc = 'index' # General information abo

[PATCH 3/6] Remove superfluous word "Copyright"

The © symbol is sufficient. --- common/rtemsstyle.sty | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/common/rtemsstyle.sty b/common/rtemsstyle.sty index 96313f1..5a7a4e4 100644 --- a/common/rtemsstyle.sty +++ b/common/rtemsstyle.sty @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ gobble=0, {\rm\Huge

[PATCH 0/6] Rework overview chapter in User Manual

Sebastian Huber (6): Remove build date from first page Update general copyright notice Remove superfluous word "Copyright" Add common header.rst to reduce copy and paste Update header.rst user: Rework overview bsp-howto/index.rst| 24 +- c-user/index.rst | 24 +

Re: arm-rtems5-g++ -std=c++11 and -std=c++0x support

Good to know. Thank you! Best regards, Mikhail On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 07:24, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 04/01/2019 22:12, Mikhail Svetkin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > RTEMS supports only GNU extensions. > > > > You can use -std=gnu++11 > > This was fixed recently.