On 1/7/19 3:31 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 07/01/2019 15:21, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
>> The sp37 test fails with an interesting error:
>>
>> *** BEGIN OF TEST SP 37 ***
>> ] *** TEST VERSION:
>> 5.0.0.eba55a6ad63a1433f50ba0d627394f447bacd04f-modified
>> ] *** TEST STATE: EXPECTED-PASS
>> ] *** TEST BUILD: RTEMS_NETWORKING RTEMS_POSIX_API
>> ] *** TEST TOOLS: 9.0.0 20181112 (RTEMS 5, RSB
>> 96673d751ab488d5d892ae67c1842aef9d5c068b, Newlib
>> df6915f029ac9acd2b479ea898388cbd7dda4974)
>> ]
>> /home/jiri/ibm/src/rtems/rtems.seb/c/src/../../testsuites/sptests/sp37/init.c:
>>
>> 185 normal_interrupt_level != _ISR_Get_level()
>> ]
>> ] *** FATAL ***
>>
>> The RISCV port has only two interrupt levels (on/off), and it seems that
>> when a task at level one (irq off) is deleted, the heir inherits
>> interrupt level one rather then restore its original level. Has anyone
>> seen this on RISCV before? It is probably something in my setup (sim or
>> bsp) but the test runs without interrupts and always fails the same way
>> regardless of compiler optimization etc.
>
> This is indeed an interesting case. The RISC-V and ARM context switch
> code no longer saves and restores the interrupt status. You probably
> found a weak spot in threaddispatch.c:
>
> void _Thread_Do_dispatch( Per_CPU_Control *cpu_self, ISR_Level level )
> {
> Thread_Control *executing;
>
> _Assert( cpu_self->thread_dispatch_disable_level == 1 );
>
> #if defined(RTEMS_SCORE_ROBUST_THREAD_DISPATCH)
> if (
> !_ISR_Is_enabled( level )
> #if defined(RTEMS_SMP)
> && rtems_configuration_is_smp_enabled()
> #endif
> ) {
> _Internal_error( INTERNAL_ERROR_BAD_THREAD_DISPATCH_ENVIRONMENT );
> }
> #endif
>
> I think we have to remove the rtems_configuration_is_smp_enabled()
> condition. Deleting the thread with interrupts disabled should result
> in a fatal error (INTERNAL_ERROR_BAD_THREAD_DISPATCH_ENVIRONMENT).
I compared this with SPARC/leon3, which has 16 levels (0 - 15). At level
15, interrupts are effectively disabled but the interrupt level is still
restored and sp37 test works. At the moment I do not compile with SMP
and I don't have RTEMS_SCORE_ROBUST_THREAD_DISPATCH defined. So none of
the above code is active ...
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
