Re: RTEMS Block Driver Execution Flow

On 19/5/18 9:45 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I am starting to write a block driver which doesn't have a media matching > any of the existing ones. I was trying to get a feel for the flow of > operations > and having trouble figuring it out. flashdisk looks to be a good guide except  > it is using rt

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

If you run nm on some of the executables, do you see the Is symbol? We need to.know its type. On Fri, May 18, 2018, 5:24 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > On 19 May 2018 at 03:29, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 19 May 2018 at 03:29, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < > vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 19 May 2018, 03:06 Joel Sherrill, wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >>> vijaykumar9...@gma

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 May 2018, 03:06 Joel Sherrill, wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 19 May 2018 at 02:29, Vijay Kumar Banerj

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Sat, 19 May 2018, 03:06 Joel Sherrill, wrote: > > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < > vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 19 May 2018 at 02:29, Vijay Kumar Banerjee >> wrote: >> >>> On 19 May 2018 at 01:30, Cillian O'Donnell >>> wrote: >>> On Fri,

Re: [GSoC] Ways to make the x86_64 port work with UEFI

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Amaan Cheval wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I've written a quick blog post summarizing the options I've considered > to make the x86_64 port work with UEFI firmware - the primary winner > seems to be in my eyes to use "gnu-efi" and to add support for the > target "pei-

Re: [PATCH] Rework to minimize and eventually eliminate RTEMS use of bsp_specs

Thanks. I will try to deal with this Monday. My specs patches are not ready to push to gcc so I need to focus on just the parts to make x86_64 right. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Amaan Cheval wrote: > To be clear, I applied this patch (with my fixes) on the 7.3 release > through the RSB to

RTEMS Block Driver Execution Flow

Hi I am starting to write a block driver which doesn't have a media matching any of the existing ones. I was trying to get a feel for the flow of operations and having trouble figuring it out. flashdisk looks to be a good guide except it is using rtems_disk_create_phys() which #3358 marks as depre

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19 May 2018 at 02:29, Vijay Kumar Banerjee > wrote: > >> On 19 May 2018 at 01:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 14:55 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, < >>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 19 May 2018 at 02:29, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > On 19 May 2018 at 01:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 14:55 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 18 May 2018 at 19:09, Cillian O'Donnell >>> wrote: >>> On F

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 19 May 2018 at 01:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 May 2018, 14:55 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, > wrote: > >> >> >> On 18 May 2018 at 19:09, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 12:36 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, < >>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On

Re: [PATCH] Rework to minimize and eventually eliminate RTEMS use of bsp_specs

To be clear, I applied this patch (with my fixes) on the 7.3 release through the RSB to test, not on GCC's master branch. > to add i386/rtemself64.h What you sent in this email thread adds rtemself64.h already. Do you mean you'd like to split the commits up or something? The only changes I made

[GSoC] Ways to make the x86_64 port work with UEFI

Hi everyone! I've written a quick blog post summarizing the options I've considered to make the x86_64 port work with UEFI firmware - the primary winner seems to be in my eyes to use "gnu-efi" and to add support for the target "pei-x86-64" (aliased to "efi-app-x86_64") to "x86_64-rtems5-objcopy" i

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Fri, 18 May 2018, 14:55 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, wrote: > > > On 18 May 2018 at 19:09, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 12:36 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 18 May 2018 at 12:30, Cillian O'Donnell >>> wrote: >>> >>> Cool, y

Re: Query regarding disk cache in RTEMS

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Udit, > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Udit agarwal > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I was looking at the internal working of a benchmark and the way it > disables > > cache for direct IO operations, needed to benchmark storage device > drivers

Re: LIST OF IO BENCHMARKS

Udit, Can you please compare pros/cons of FIO, IOZONE, and Bonnie++, probably in a blog post is a good idea. The GPLv2 is not a problem for test suites / benchmarks. It is only a problem for code that should get merged into the rtems.git. Gedare On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Udit agarwal wr

Re: Query regarding disk cache in RTEMS

Udit, On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Udit agarwal wrote: > Hi all, > I was looking at the internal working of a benchmark and the way it disables > cache for direct IO operations, needed to benchmark storage device drivers. > I have a small query regarding how cache is organized in RTEMS: > > U

Re: [PATCH] removed double 'with'

Good eye! Thanks for the patch. Committed. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Malte Münch wrote: > --- > c-user/configuring_a_system.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst > b/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst > index 2da9601..5

[PATCH] removed double 'with'

--- c-user/configuring_a_system.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst b/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst index 2da9601..542a536 100644 --- a/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst +++ b/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ appr

Re: [PATCH 01/16] beatnik: Move -Dxxx to configure.ac

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 18/05/18 15:42, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Sebastian Huber < >> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > ed-brains.de>> wrote: >> >>

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 18 May 2018 at 19:09, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 May 2018, 12:36 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, > wrote: > >> >> On 18 May 2018 at 12:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: >> >> >>> Cool, you should run it for the full testsuite and take a look at that >>> report (takes a while.. around 575 tes

Re: [PATCH 01/16] beatnik: Move -Dxxx to configure.ac

On 18/05/18 15:42, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 18/05/18 15:21, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:41 AM, Sebastian Huber mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains

Re: [PATCH 01/16] beatnik: Move -Dxxx to configure.ac

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 18/05/18 15:21, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:41 AM, Sebastian Huber < >> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > ed-brains.de>> wrote: >> >>

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Fri, 18 May 2018, 12:36 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, wrote: > > On 18 May 2018 at 12:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > > >> Cool, you should run it for the full testsuite and take a look at that >> report (takes a while.. around 575 tests) >> >>> When I try to run the full testsuites it gives the

Re: [PATCH] Rework to minimize and eventually eliminate RTEMS use of bsp_specs

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:38 AM, Amaan Cheval wrote: > I just compiled my local fixed copy (adding rtems.h back in) and > there's good news! With the patch, the x86_64 compile stub works with > a blank bsp_specs file! > Awesome! Can you send me your changes as a patch? I am thinking I need to m

Re: [PATCH 01/16] beatnik: Move -Dxxx to configure.ac

On 18/05/18 15:21, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:41 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 16/05/18 17:09, Joel Sherrill wrote: Updates #3425. ---   bsps/powerpc/beatnik/config/beatnik.cfg       | 2 +-

Re: [PATCH 01/16] beatnik: Move -Dxxx to configure.ac

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:41 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 16/05/18 17:09, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> Updates #3425. >> --- >> bsps/powerpc/beatnik/config/beatnik.cfg | 2 +- >> c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/beatnik/configure.ac | 2 ++ >> 2 files chang

Re: [PATCH] fix typo: extesion->extension

Thanks, I checked it in. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine gesc

[PATCH] fix typo: extesion->extension

--- c-user/fatal_error.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c-user/fatal_error.rst b/c-user/fatal_error.rst index d8566f0..7945030 100644 --- a/c-user/fatal_error.rst +++ b/c-user/fatal_error.rst @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ The fatal error handler in the static extension s

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On 18 May 2018 at 12:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote: > Cool, you should run it for the full testsuite and take a look at that > report (takes a while.. around 575 tests) > >> >>> When I try to run the full testsuites it gives the following error . What could be causing this ? ---

Re: [PATCH] updated chapter references in chapter 2 of c-user doc.

> On 18 May 2018, at 6:11 pm, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > This stuff in > > https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/c-user/overview.html#manual-organization > > looks hard to maintain. I have not had a chance to see if this can be automated. > What is the value for the user? There are no r

Re: [PATCH] covoar.cc: Correct build path checks for multiple executables.

On Fri, 18 May 2018, 07:46 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2018, 11:52 Cillian O'Donnell, > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 17 May 2018, 21:32 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> hello, >>> >>> I have attached the html report ! >>> >> >> Report looks good!