On 23/03/18 16:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Hello Vidushi, Sebastian:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
Hello Vidushi,
the RTEMS Trace Linker is definitely an interesting tool to track down
difficult and specific issues. However, this is a nice to have optional
out-of-box Tr
On 25/03/18 05:20, Chris Johns wrote:
On 24/3/18 1:27 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I tried to consolidate the cpukit Makefile.am. This ended up in the following
problem. The content of librtemscpu.a depends on the CPU port. This is currently
done via a non-standard
_SUBDIRS = ../@RTEMS_CP
Sir,
Please check if this works.
Thanks and Regards
Abhinav Jain
Earlier the function valid was checking the validity of the git repository,
the program was working in. For doing this the function was first checking
whether path exists or not and after that it was checking whether the
directory
Hi!
I have uploaded my final proposal pdf for GSOC'18. I have tried to
incorporate all the comments made. PFA the final draft of the proposal.
Thanks for being such a wonderful community! I enjoyed every bit of the
application process.
Warm regards,
Vidushi Vashishth
GSOC_proposal_Vidushi_ru
On 26/03/2018 14:49, Amaan Cheval wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for your comments on the document, by the way. Regarding the
> following comment:
>
>> We should support multiboot as well for legacy X86 BIOSes. There are
> headers about that can do this.
>
> This is a great point - this way legacy BIOS
Sir,
I sent the mail using git-send-email only. I don't know why git reports it
as corrupt. I will resend it.
Thanks and Regards
Abhinav Jain
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:39 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 23/02/2018 15:02, Abhinav Jain wrote:
> > I have made the changes as per your suggestions.
> >
1. Yes , I plan to work on identifying the discrepancies between what
covoar reports directly and what the gcov reports based on its gcov output.
2. I understand this point that the scripting that generates symbol set
file, needs to be modified accordingly
3. I have planned to make a note and un
Hi!
Thanks for your comments on the document, by the way. Regarding the
following comment:
> We should support multiboot as well for legacy X86 BIOSes. There are
headers about that can do this.
This is a great point - this way legacy BIOSes only need something like
GRUB (or a bootloader implemen
On 21/02/2018 01:47, Maksim E. Kozlov wrote:
> According to commit d30be3129e9681a74efc80ce241aaf3c3a5b0efe in
> rtems-source-builder repo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maksim E. Kozlov
Pushed. Thank you.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://list
On 23/02/2018 15:02, Abhinav Jain wrote:
> I have made the changes as per your suggestions.
> Please review the changes and guide me, whether I have done it correcctly or
> not
> and also if something more is to be added to the code.
>
I cannot push this patch, git reports it as corrupt. Did yo
On 14/03/2018 17:20, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 13/03/18 22:58, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 09/03/2018 19:55, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 06/11/17 10:03, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 26/10/17 08:22, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Please review this patch carefully. It adds a new chapter "ARM Board
On 20/03/2018 18:10, Amaan Cheval wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:44 AM Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 20/03/2018 16:21, Amaan Cheval wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:23 AM Chris Johns wrote:
On 19/03/2018 18:36, Amaan Cheval wrote:
>>> (Assuming that by tables you meant the Local Vector T
Just a couple of questions and planning issues. The planning issues
are because the requirements for some of the work are likely not solid
on our side.
1. Do you plan to work on identifying the discrepancies between
what covoar reports directly and what gcov reports based on its
gcov file output?
submitted !
If you find time , please give final review as well.
Thanks
On 26 Mar 2018 1:44 a.m., "Joel Sherrill" wrote:
> I am out and not at a computer. Someone can double check me but I believe
> you can replace the PDF you upload.
>
> Unless someone answers soon, just upload it.
>
> --joel
I am out and not at a computer. Someone can double check me but I believe
you can replace the PDF you upload.
Unless someone answers soon, just upload it.
--joel
On Mar 25, 2018 2:37 PM, "Vijay Kumar Banerjee"
wrote:
> It's the last day before the deadline!
> Please provide a final review of t
It's the last day before the deadline!
Please provide a final review of the proposal before submitting.
Thanks
-- vijay
On 24 March 2018 at 21:37, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> hello mentors and other developers of the community , there are only three
> days remaining to the GSoC proposal subm
Hi
Less than 24 hours left to get your applications in as final.
Remember you can replace the PDF even when marked
final.
Please don't let a paperwork issue keep you from being
considered.
Thanks.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://l
17 matches
Mail list logo
