Before or after the "Build the libbsd without optimization." step, I would add
a statement about fixing up any compilation errors. Maybe most commands will
compile after making the changes listed previously but I had to fixup errors
related to termios differences between RTEMS and FREEBSD. Bes
On 10/02/2017 02:22, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Feb 9, 2017 7:29 AM, "Jan Sommer" mailto:soja-li...@aries.uberspace.de>> wrote:
Hello,
As far as I see there is no support for x86_64 yet. I found that
there was a GSoC proposal to add BSP for the architecture, but I am
not sure if it
On 10/02/2017 00:09, Kirspel, Kevin wrote:
We could probably create a tty test driver and convert usbserialXX test cases
into termiosXX test cases. This would delink the two and we would only have
the one usbserial test case.
It would be good to do this.
As far as the copyright, I can cha
Hello Kevin,
thanks for your work.
Out of curiosity: It seems that you are one of the first users of the new
porting process for user space applications (beneath Sebastian and me). Did you
encounter any problems that might be worth adding to the guide in libbsd.txt?
Beneath that please see my
On Feb 9, 2017 7:29 AM, "Jan Sommer" wrote:
Hello,
As far as I see there is no support for x86_64 yet. I found that there was
a GSoC proposal to add BSP for the architecture, but I am not sure if it
was accepted.
Does someone know what is the current status of 64bit support and what
would be mi
Hello,
As far as I see there is no support for x86_64 yet. I found that there
was a GSoC proposal to add BSP for the architecture, but I am not sure
if it was accepted.
Does someone know what is the current status of 64bit support and what
would be missing for a working BSP with a PCI and cl
We could probably create a tty test driver and convert usbserialXX test cases
into termiosXX test cases. This would delink the two and we would only have
the one usbserial test case.
As far as the copyright, I can change it to whatever you want. I based the
test cases off Sebastian's test s
