I'd really like to merge it, the problem is that the following patches
when applied as a whole don't run on or1ksim neither qemu. I suspect
this might be due to frequency/uart parameters change.
Gedare, can we push the subset of patches that work?
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Gedare Bloom
On 26/03/2016 12:37 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
With the documentation being converted to Rest and Spinx for 4.11, we have
an issue of how to track changes needed when it is finished and we start
using it on the master.
Huh? This is a change to the doc file in a test and not the documentation.
S
Hi Habeeb,
Cortex-M4F is supported since it is used by several BSPs. Anyway, most
closest to TM4C129 is probably TM4C123 which is supported by lm4f120 BSP
which is a variant of lm3s69xx BSP. Search RTEMS source tree for more
information...
Cheers,
Karel
On 03/25/16 09:13 PM, Olufowobi, H
Greetings,
I am Habeeb Olufowobi, a graduate student of Systems and Computer Science
at Howard University, Washington, D.C.
I would like work to on porting RTEMS to ARM Cortex-M4F microcontroller (TI
TM4C series Crypto Connected Launchpad http://www.ti.com/tool/EK-TM4C129EXL
).
I will like to kn
cpukit/pppd/auth.c:78:19: warning: 'rcsid' defined but not used
[-Wunused-const-variable]
In so many files rcsid is not used but defined as static. It is
useless I think. Should I send the patches for it ?
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://li
Attached with this mail is the link to the git repo that contains the
scripts from the previous SOCIS port of Rock on RTEMS.
https://github.com/Sambeet161616/Rock-Port_ana
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Sambeet Panigrahi
wrote:
> I am also adding the scripts I obtained from the previous port
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Great! Remember today is the deadline to get the Google application in with
> the PDF of your proposal. Do your best and we will work to fine tune it
> assuming you meet the Google deadline.
>
Not just today, but I think it is in 2.5 hours o
Great! Remember today is the deadline to get the Google application in with
the PDF of your proposal. Do your best and we will work to fine tune it
assuming you meet the Google deadline.
Please update the table of students (you need a Trac/wiki account to do
this) and include a link to your propos
Not that I'm aware of.
The PR is here: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2578
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ged...@gwmail.gwu.edu [mailto:ged...@gwmail.gwu.edu] Im Auftrag von Gedare
Bloom
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. März 2016 14:26
An: Gruber, Mario (SPACE)
Cc: devel@rtems.org; Chris Johns
Be
I was going to commit this but no longer have the original patch in my
mailbox.
It looks screwed up in the mail archives.
If either of you send it to me, I will commit it.
--joel
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> This looks fine to me if someone cares to commit it.
>
> On
With the documentation being converted to Rest and Spinx for 4.11, we have
an issue of how to track changes needed when it is finished and we start
using it on the master.
Sebastian said he has stopped submitting doc changes into then. I don't
know if he has any he is tracking locally or not.
I h
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Jinhyun wrote:
> Thank you for the comment.
> We got little bit delayed to meet the RTEMS coding standard.
> Regarding the source commitment, we have following questions.
>
> 1. Shall we just post diffs to the mailing list? (FYI, our implementation
> includes abo
Was this resolved?
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Mario Gruber
wrote:
> ---
> rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-common-1.cfg | 2 +-
> rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-git-1.cfg| 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-common-1.cfg
This looks fine to me if someone cares to commit it.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Zhu Zhongjie wrote:
>
> ---
> cpukit/libcsupport/src/assoclocalbyname.c | 2 --
> cpukit/libcsupport/src/assoclocalbyremote.c | 2 --
> cpukit/libcsupport/src/assoclocalbyremotebitfield.c | 3
This looks good to commit if anyone can get to it.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 2:26 PM, punitvara wrote:
> This patch basically fixes some typo in document file.
> ---
> testsuites/samples/fileio/fileio.doc | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testsu
Hi Sane Sai Charan,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
>> Hello Sai Charan,
>>
>> as for your proposal "RTEMS MMU/MPU support for PowerPC",
>> I expect that Gedare is right person to comment.
>>
I can't comment on your draft.
OK, that should be a good set for your proposal. I'm not sure what the
status is for Pi2 now. It may need some cleanup. Make sure you get
your final PDF and enrollment submitted today.
Please keep devel on any emails of non-private nature.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Mudit Jain wrote:
> Hi
For prior effort on SD card see
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2015/RaspberryPi_peripherals_and_SD_card#SDcardsupport
There is another student that is planning to add USB/NIC support. You
would be best served to avoid too much overlap, but if you go for a
different RPi model that may not matter
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Sai Charan,
>
> as for your proposal "RTEMS MMU/MPU support for PowerPC",
> I expect that Gedare is right person to comment.
>
> But I think that even proposal for LwIP integration
> worth to be submitted.
>
> I think that two proposal to
Hi everyone,
I am Mudit Jain, a final year undergraduate student in Electronics and
Communication Engineering at BITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus.
I wish to apply for GSOC 2016, with RTEMS as the mentoring organization.
I have gone through your website for details regarding the development
process a
Hello Sai Charan,
as for your proposal "RTEMS MMU/MPU support for PowerPC",
I expect that Gedare is right person to comment.
But I think that even proposal for LwIP integration
worth to be submitted.
I think that two proposal to single org are possible
for one student and selection can be done a
Hi,
I am writing this again because my previous mail got a bounce back but I am
not able to see it in archive.
With the help from Rock members, I could secure some scripts and
documentation from the previous SOCIS project on Porting Rock on RTEMS.
That caused a lot many changes in my proposal.I re
22 matches
Mail list logo
