On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Nick Withers
wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 13:17 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > It looks like the PowerPC bug in GCC about local symbols is fixed.
> >
> > Should we bump gcc to a git tag or the next snapshot?
>
> We already have. See
> https://lists.rtems.org/pi
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 13:17 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> It looks like the PowerPC bug in GCC about local symbols is fixed.
>
> Should we bump gcc to a git tag or the next snapshot?
We already have. See
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2016-January/013461.html and ht
tps://git.rtems.org/
It looks like the PowerPC bug in GCC about local symbols is fixed.
Should we bump gcc to a git tag or the next snapshot?
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Bug debug/65779] [5 Regression] undefined local symbol on powerpc
[regression]
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:57:26 -0600
From: jaku
We need the config.log from the subdirectory where the failure occurred.
This looks like one from the top directory,
Look at the build log to see what directory the build failed in and grab
that one.
FWIW a quick google for this issue on Ubuntu showed someone suggested:
sudo apt-get install pyth
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:15 AM, punit vara wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Aun-Ali Zaidi wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I was having the same problem yesterday and managed to find a fix by
>> > installing libpython2.7-dev:
>> >
>
On Feb 9, 2016 10:37 PM, "Saket Sinha" wrote:
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> Thanks for your inputs.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Saket Sinha
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I think this is early for this but I need to enquire if