On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Nick Withers <nick.with...@anu.edu.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 13:17 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > It looks like the PowerPC bug in GCC about local symbols is fixed. > > > > Should we bump gcc to a git tag or the next snapshot? > > We already have. See > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2016-January/013461.html and ht > tps://git.rtems.org/rtems-source > -builder/commit/?id=e3b9fb68d480a1044d75c4cac09e638ef7483114 Awesome! Thanks Nick! I have noticed you have been on top of things. :) > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > Subject: [Bug debug/65779] [5 Regression] undefined local symbol on > > powerpc [regression] > > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:57:26 -0600 > > From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> > > To: j...@gcc.gnu.org <j...@gcc.gnu.org> > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779 > > > > Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------- > > Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED > > Resolution|--- |FIXED > > > > --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > > Fixed. > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
