Re: Planned SMP Improvements

2016-02-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
8) Write up your experience as a new Tutorial on our Wiki. ;) On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 01/02/16 14:39, Darshit Shah wrote: >>> >>> >Maybe we can implement >>> > >>> >Improve the SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support >>> >https://devel.rtems.org

Re: general comments on sysiinit patches

2016-02-02 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 02/02/16 10:04, Chris Johns wrote: [ Sorry, laptop slipped and it sent the email ... ] On 2/02/2016 9:49 PM, Chris Johns wrote: >On 2/02/2016 7:25 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >>> >>>How do we want to proceed? Chris, what is your opinion with respect to >>>this EXTERN magic? >>> >>>some

Re: Planned SMP Improvements

2016-02-02 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 01/02/16 14:39, Darshit Shah wrote: >Maybe we can implement > >Improve the SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support >https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2510 > >as part of this years GSoC. > I've already mentioned that I'd be interested in picking this up as a potential project. How

Re: general comments on sysiinit patches

2016-02-02 Thread Chris Johns
[ Sorry, laptop slipped and it sent the email ... ] On 2/02/2016 9:49 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 2/02/2016 7:25 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >>> >>> How do we want to proceed? Chris, what is your opinion with respect to >>> this EXTERN magic? >>> >>> some.h >>> >>> #ifndef SOME_XYZ_EXTERN >>> #d

Re: general comments on sysiinit patches

2016-02-02 Thread Chris Johns
On 2/02/2016 7:25 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 29/01/16 07:28, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >> >> On 28/01/16 03:54, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Sebastian Huber >>> wrote: > > >On 27/01/16 15:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> > >> > >>On T