On 16/01/2016 4:57 AM, Jan Sommer wrote:
> Am Friday 15 January 2016, 11:24:00 schrieb Marcos Díaz:
>> Hi,
>> You can try if the latest snapshot of gcc works:
>> Check this patch, in this case I made a modification for the arm bset, if
>> you use another architecture you have to make the same chang
Hi
In the dark ages of RTEMS, the stack size argument wasn't really give much
thought when writing the tests. As we move down in target size, I am
wondering if we should make as many of the tests as possible use the
default stack size.
Isaac's reduction of stack size made me think of this. It may
Isaac.
In patches 1 and 2:
* If the HAL code might be re-updated, the RTEMS changes should be
ifdef'd so it may be easier to integrate future versions.
* By the same token, you may want to ifdef out unused code instead of
deleting lines.
In patch 3:
Does this clash with Sebastian's recent patch r
Am Friday 15 January 2016, 11:24:00 schrieb Marcos Díaz:
> Hi,
> You can try if the latest snapshot of gcc works:
> Check this patch, in this case I made a modification for the arm bset, if
> you use another architecture you have to make the same change in your bset.
>
Thank you, that seems to be
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> On 15 January 2016 at 16:47, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> >> Hi Team,
> >>
> >> My name is Darshit Shah and I'd like to (potentially) be a part of the
> >> RTEMS project for GSoC 2016. I kn
Considering your relationship with Dr. Brandenburg, you should
consider working on our SMP scheduling projects. Condition Variables
is part of that as well, and you may consider it. Sebastian Huber is
the best technical point-of-contact for the current state on both of
these, and he will (hopefully
On 15 January 2016 at 16:47, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> My name is Darshit Shah and I'd like to (potentially) be a part of the
>> RTEMS project for GSoC 2016. I know that the organization applications
>> open only next month, but I
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> My name is Darshit Shah and I'd like to (potentially) be a part of the
> RTEMS project for GSoC 2016. I know that the organization applications
> open only next month, but I'm assuming that you will apply again this
> year and be
Hi,
You can try if the latest snapshot of gcc works:
Check this patch, in this case I made a modification for the arm bset, if
you use another architecture you have to make the same change in your bset.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:39 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current version of the rsb loads the
Given that Trac generates release reports from tickets and this
seems important, could you file a ticket explaining what this is,
source URL, etc.
FWIW I think we all have to be more conscious of helping Trac
help us in this way. :)
--joel
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Sebastian Huber <
sebas
---
.../stm32f4x/hal/CMSIS/RTOS/Template/cmsis_os.h| 707 -
.../stm32f7x/hal/CMSIS/RTOS/Template/cmsis_os.h| 707 -
2 files changed, 1414 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/stm32f4x/hal/CMSIS/RTOS/Template/cmsis_os.h
delete mode
---
.../libbsp/arm/atsam/libraries/libboard/board.h| 3 ++
.../arm/atsam/libraries/libboard/board_v71_xult.h | 4 +++
.../libboard/resources_v71/system_samv71.c | 16 +--
.../libraries/libboard/source/board_lowlevel.c | 5
.../libraries/libboard/source/board_memori
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lm3s69xx/Makefile.am | 2 +-
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lm3s69xx/startup/bspreset.c | 35 --
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc176x/Makefile.am | 2 +-
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/lpc176x/startup/bspreset.c| 43 --
c/src/lib/libbsp/a
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/shared/armv7m/irq/armv7m-irq.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/shared/armv7m/irq/armv7m-irq.c
b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/shared/armv7m/irq/armv7m-irq.c
index 6ad9482..53ab513 100644
--- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/a
Hi,
The current version of the rsb loads the gcc-4.9.3 sources to build gcc.
However as discussed previously Ada-support in this version is broken
for RTEMS.
The current 4.9-branch has a fix. Would it be possible to use a recent
snapshot of this branch for the source builder until 4.9.4 is rele
15 matches
Mail list logo