Am Friday 15 January 2016, 11:24:00 schrieb Marcos Díaz: > Hi, > You can try if the latest snapshot of gcc works: > Check this patch, in this case I made a modification for the arm bset, if > you use another architecture you have to make the same change in your bset. >
Thank you, that seems to be a better way (I just overwrote the gcc-tarball of rsb with my own). However, I meant to suggest that we such a patch upstream in general. The current situation is that you can build a toolchain with Ada-support using the rsb, it will compile, but the programs it creates will fail at least for arm, but I think the error is architecture agnostic. So you need to find out why it fails, apply a patch like yours locally and rebuild which makes the process quite painful. I don't know if the policy says, it has to be a stable gcc-release, but the gcc-4.9 branch only accepts regression and docu fixes. @Joel+Chris: What do you think? I am aware that Ada is the ugly little stepchild no one really wants to play with, but would still appreciate an easy way to build a working toolchain. ;-) Cheers, Jan > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:39 AM, <soja-li...@aries.uberspace.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The current version of the rsb loads the gcc-4.9.3 sources to build gcc. > > However as discussed previously Ada-support in this version is broken for > > RTEMS. > > The current 4.9-branch has a fix. Would it be possible to use a recent > > snapshot of this branch for the source builder until 4.9.4 is released? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Jan > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
