On 7/31/2015 8:11 AM, Rohini Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
How is the number of processors to be used for an application specified?
The used count minimum of that supported in hardware and that configured. How
to specify the latter?
https://docs.rtems.org/doc-current/share/rtems/html/c_user/Configuri
On 31/07/15 15:17, Yurii Shevtsov wrote:
Where is the linker script which is responsible for
.rtemsroset.bsd.nexus.content section?
This is linkcmds.base, search for rtemsroset.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189
Where is the linker script which is responsible for
.rtemsroset.bsd.nexus.content section? And how debuging the code will
help me with empty section??
2015-06-29 9:43 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Huber :
> You can debug this issue on Qemu. The Nexus childes are registered in a
> linker set, so I would cons
Hi,
How is the number of processors to be used for an application specified?
The used count minimum of that supported in hardware and that configured.
How to specify the latter?
Thanks.
On 29 Jul 2015 15:29, "Sebastian Huber"
wrote:
>
>
> On 29/07/15 11:52, Rohini Kulkarni wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On
On 31/07/15 14:51, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> Is it possible to construct objects without an address via plain C++?
Sorry I don't understand the question. Rephrase please?
Global objects and objects of static storage duration don't take an
address.
This register asm variable has no address,
El 31/7/2015 2:37, "Sebastian Huber"
escribió:
>
> Hello Daniel,
Hello Sebastian.
>
>
> On 30/07/15 17:26, Daniel Gutson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Daniel Gutson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >El 30/7/2015 11:27, "Joel Sherrill"
escribió:
>>
>>
>>
>>On 7/
On 31/07/15 09:10, Chris Johns wrote:
On 31/07/2015 4:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>>Is this for 4.12 ?
>
>This is just a proof-of-concept patch, but it would be nice to include
>this in the next release along with the C11 threads support.
>
If you have tests and they are ok then why not
On 31/07/2015 4:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>> Is this for 4.12 ?
>
> This is just a proof-of-concept patch, but it would be nice to include
> this in the next release along with the C11 threads support.
>
If you have tests and they are ok then why not put it in.
>>
>> What happens if I bu
