On 31/07/2015 4:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> Is this for 4.12 ? > > This is just a proof-of-concept patch, but it would be nice to include > this in the next release along with the C11 threads support. >
If you have tests and they are ok then why not put it in. >> >> What happens if I build RTEMS with --disable-posix ? If I use locale in >> C++ it pulls in the 'once' support which pulls in this file which would >> give unresolved externals. > > The pthread_once() is always available just like the POSIX keys. If you > use std::thread, however, with --disable-posix, then you get unresolved > references. Ah yes. > > The criterion for me to get rid of the --disable-posix option is a > constructor based initialization (linker sets). > Lets remove it unless someone has a good reason not to. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
