Re: [rtems commit] sp13: Update configuration to account for messages on fourth message queue

2015-04-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
This test fix is all right, but it is not clear why this worked before. Something must have changed in RTEMS or the tool chain to trigger this bug and this might be an additional problem or not. On 15/04/15 21:21, Joel Sherrill wrote: Abusing this topic more, this is the complete analysis. I m

Re: [PATCH] sp13: Document message buffer usage and adjust configuration

2015-04-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 4/15/2015 2:48 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Joel Sherrill > wrote: >> >> On 4/15/2015 2:45 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Joel Sherrill >>> wrote: --- testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h | 23 +++ 1

Re: [PATCH] sp13: Document message buffer usage and adjust configuration

2015-04-15 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On 4/15/2015 2:45 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Joel Sherrill >> wrote: >>> --- >>> testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h | 23 +++ >>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>

Re: [PATCH] sp13: Document message buffer usage and adjust configuration

2015-04-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 4/15/2015 2:45 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Joel Sherrill > wrote: >> --- >> testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h | 23 +++ >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h >> b/testsuites/s

Re: [PATCH] sp13: Document message buffer usage and adjust configuration

2015-04-15 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > --- > testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h | 23 +++ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h > b/testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h > index 3b170bf..8e5ffbb 100644 >

[PATCH] sp13: Document message buffer usage and adjust configuration

2015-04-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
--- testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h | 23 +++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h b/testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h index 3b170bf..8e5ffbb 100644 --- a/testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h +++ b/testsuites/sptests/sp13/s

Re: [rtems commit] sp13: Update configuration to account for messages on fourth message queue

2015-04-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
Abusing this topic more, this is the complete analysis. I missed the final loop of create/delete queue. This is the comment in system.h I have now. /* * Created in init.c: *Q1 - CONFIGURE_MESSAGE_BUFFERS_FOR_QUEUE( 100, MESSAGE_SIZE ) (1600) *Q2 - CONFIGURE_MESSAGE_BUFFERS_FOR_QUEUE( 1

Re: [rtems commit] sp13: Update configuration to account for messages on fourth message queue

2015-04-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 4/15/2015 12:13 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> Two message queues get deleted before the forth is created. Why did this >> work before and what is the root cause for this failure? We will never know >> after this patch. >> > Yes I don't

[PATCH] Led.h: Minor code adjustments for clarity, and cleaned up comments

2015-04-15 Thread Jeff Mayes
From: Jeff Mayes --- led/README | 8 ++--- led/led.h | 98 +- 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/led/README b/led/README index 4a2ab42..e78f1fd 100644 --- a/led/README +++ b/led/README @@ -1,12 +1,10 @@

Re: [rtems commit] sp13: Update configuration to account for messages on fourth message queue

2015-04-15 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Two message queues get deleted before the forth is created. Why did this > work before and what is the root cause for this failure? We will never know > after this patch. > Yes I don't understand what this is fixing. The test, or the failur

various PowerPC BSP failures with tools head

2015-04-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi I attempted to build all BSPs with the git head of all the tools. Most went ok but a handful of PowerPC BSPs did not link. mcp750 mtx603e mvme2100 mvme2307 qemuprep and qemuprep-altivec These are all variants of motorola_powerpc. The failure is: powerpc-rtems4.11-objcopy -O binary -R .commen

[PATCH] score: Add header to _Watchdog_Remove()

2015-04-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
Add watchdog header parameter to _Watchdog_Remove() to be in line with the other operations. Add _Watchdog_Remove_ticks() and _Watchdog_Remove_seconds() for convenience. Update #2307. --- cpukit/posix/src/alarm.c| 2 +- cpukit/posix/src/psignalunblockthread.c |

Re: GSoC 2015 - Clang support and Eclipse plugin work

2015-04-15 Thread Charith Eranga
Hi Asiri, I did not had enough time to do a sufficient research on the project. So I thought it would be better to work on this project outside of GSOC. I'm currently doing my background research on the matter. I really value assistance I am getting from you and other developers on RTEMS project.

Re: Fwd: GCC 5.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2015-04-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
Apart from this https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-March/010710.html GCC 5.1 worked fine. I hope we can solve this issue within a new build system. On 13/04/15 00:49, Joel Sherrill wrote: FYI .. Not suggesting we update 4.11 to this but wondering what known issues we have with it.